On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 12:20 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
However, I think there is one difference between the clock used just to
enable the DSS registers, and the one used to output pixels: we need to
be able to adjust the rate of the clock.
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:05 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
conversion of the DSS driver soon. Ideally before any new DSS
features are added. We really need to be
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
and not the clock used for the pixel clock? If so, I'm fine with having
fck to be what it is currently, but then we need a new name for the
clock used for pixel clock, which is
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:50 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Not directly related, but something I've been wondering about is how to
abstract the DSI/HDMI PLLs in DSS. What do you think, would it be
possible/worth it to create struct clks
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
conversion of the DSS driver soon. Ideally before any new DSS
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
and not the clock used for the pixel clock? If so, I'm fine with having
fck to be what it is currently, but then we need a new name for the
On 4/11/2011 6:05 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
conversion of the DSS driver soon.
On 4/11/2011 6:05 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
conversion of the DSS driver soon.
Hi Paul,
On 4/7/2011 9:27 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi, Benoît,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock aliases
is the way to go for right now. The clock
Hi
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock
aliases
Hi Tomi,
On 4/8/2011 7:51 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi, Benoît,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that
Hi Tomi,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also, I hope you and the other DSS hackers can finish the PM runtime
conversion of the DSS driver soon. Ideally before any new DSS
features are added. We really need to be able to separate the OMAP
integration details from the drivers,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:36 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 4/8/2011 7:51 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
- If the modules are handled separately, how should the dependencies be
handled? For example, dss_core's reset will reset all the other modules
also, and most of the submodules
Hi Tomi,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Of course, at some point soon, those clock aliases are going to go away.
But hopefully you all will have converted the driver over to PM runtime at
that point.
Once that
Hello Tomi, Benoît,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock aliases
is the way to go for right now. The clock aliases are not hardware data;
they just control
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi, Benoît,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock
aliases
is the way to go
Paul, Benoit,
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 09:53 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi Paul, Benoit,
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock aliases
is the way to go for right now. The clock aliases are not hardware
Hi Paul, Benoit,
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:12 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Based on the E-mail thread so far, I'd say that changing the clock aliases
is the way to go for right now. The clock aliases are not hardware data;
they just control how the clock hardware is mapped to the drivers.
Hi Tomi, Benoît, et al,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Currently we have these aliases for OMAP4:
dss_clk - dss_dss_clk
fck - dss_fck
ick - dummy_ck
If that would be changed to:
fck - dss_dss_clk
ick - dss_fck
The driver would work the same way for all OMAPs.
This looks
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 06:51 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 2:58 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:12 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 1:03 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:21 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 2:58 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Anyway. To get things working for rc2 (DSS currently crashes due to not
enabling dss_clk) we need to either:
1) Change the clock aliases as above
Changing the clock alias for my point
Hi Archit,
On 3/31/2011 8:42 AM, Taneja, Archit wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 06:51 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 2:58 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:12 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 1:03 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been discussing with Sumit and Archit to understand how the DSS
clocks are set up on OMAP4. I think I now have some idea how things
work, but I'm still at loss why things are the way they are.
So, if I look at OMAP4 TRM, Figure 10-4 DSS Clock Tree, there are two
clocks in
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011 8:48 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been discussing with Sumit and Archit to understand how the DSS
clocks are set up on OMAP4. I think I now have some idea how things
work, but I'm still at loss why things are the way they are.
So, if I look at OMAP4
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011 8:48 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been discussing with Sumit and Archit to understand how the DSS
clocks are set up on OMAP4. I think I now have some idea how things
work, but I'm
On 3/30/2011 1:03 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011 8:48 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been discussing with Sumit and Archit to understand how the DSS
clocks are set up on OMAP4. I think I now have
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:12 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 1:03 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011 8:48 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been discussing with Sumit and Archit to
On 3/30/2011 2:58 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:12 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 3/30/2011 1:03 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:32 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 3/30/2011 8:48 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
Hi Benoit, Paul,
I've been
29 matches
Mail list logo
