On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:14:29PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Felipe Balbi [120514 12:41]:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]:
> > > > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]:
> > > > >
> > > > > That whole MMC card detection is al
* Felipe Balbi [120514 12:41]:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]:
> > > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]:
> > > >
> > > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat,
> > > > can you guys look into that ?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]:
> > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]:
> > >
> > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat,
> > > can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a
>
* Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]:
> * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]:
> >
> > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat,
> > can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a
> > threaded IRQ handler ?
> >
> > I mean, all the MMC core should need is
* Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]:
>
> That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat,
> can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a
> threaded IRQ handler ?
>
> I mean, all the MMC core should need is an IRQ number (through GPIOs or
> not doesn't/
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:06:25PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 2:47 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, F
On 5/14/2012 2:47 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ?
> > > Can you check transc
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ?
> > Can you check transceiver has actually probed ? I guess panda's using
> > twl6030-usb.c
>
> Ah.
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ?
> Can you check transceiver has actually probed ? I guess panda's using
> twl6030-usb.c
Ah. Perhaps it's then about this?
[0.352905] Skipping twl internal clock init
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:49:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> I'm seeing the following crash on Panda, when booting with today's
> linux-next, using the attached config.
>
> Tomi
>
>
> [1.923400] musb-hdrc: version 6.0, ?dma?, otg (peripheral+host)
> [1.923400]
11 matches
Mail list logo