Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:14:29PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Felipe Balbi [120514 12:41]: > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]: > > > > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]: > > > > > > > > > > That whole MMC card detection is al

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-15 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi [120514 12:41]: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]: > > > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]: > > > > > > > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat, > > > > can you guys look into that ?

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]: > > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]: > > > > > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat, > > > can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a >

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [120514 11:19]: > * Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]: > > > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat, > > can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a > > threaded IRQ handler ? > > > > I mean, all the MMC core should need is

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi [120514 11:04]: > > That whole MMC card detection is also pretty screwed up. Balaji/Venkat, > can you guys look into that ? Probably making something generic using a > threaded IRQ handler ? > > I mean, all the MMC core should need is an IRQ number (through GPIOs or > not doesn't/

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:06:25PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 5/14/2012 2:47 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>>On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, F

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 5/14/2012 2:47 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ? > > > Can you check transc

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ? > > Can you check transceiver has actually probed ? I guess panda's using > > twl6030-usb.c > > Ah.

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ? > Can you check transceiver has actually probed ? I guess panda's using > twl6030-usb.c Ah. Perhaps it's then about this? [0.352905] Skipping twl internal clock init

Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

2012-05-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:49:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > I'm seeing the following crash on Panda, when booting with today's > linux-next, using the attached config. > > Tomi > > > [1.923400] musb-hdrc: version 6.0, ?dma?, otg (peripheral+host) > [1.923400]