On 04/03/2012 05:58 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:03:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 04/03/2012 04:29 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Please explain why this CAN controller cannot be handled by the existing
C_CAN driver, eventually with some extensions. The register
Hi All,
Subject line of this patch should be
ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller
Regards
AnilKumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 04/03/2012 02:44 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 04/03/2012 02:32 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
This patch adds the support for Bosch D_CAN controller.
Bosch D_CAN controller is a full-CAN implementation compliant to
CAN protocol version 2.0 part A and B. Bosch D_CAN user manual
can be
On 04/03/2012 02:32 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
This patch adds the support for Bosch D_CAN controller.
Bosch D_CAN controller is a full-CAN implementation compliant to
CAN protocol version 2.0 part A and B. Bosch D_CAN user manual
can be obtained from: http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/media/
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for reviewing the patch
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 18:14:55, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 04/03/2012 02:32 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
This patch adds the support for Bosch D_CAN controller.
Bosch D_CAN controller is a full-CAN implementation compliant to
CAN protocol
On 04/03/2012 03:41 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for reviewing the patch
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 18:14:55, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 04/03/2012 02:32 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
This patch adds the support for Bosch D_CAN controller.
Bosch D_CAN controller is a
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 19:19:32, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 04/03/2012 03:41 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for reviewing the patch
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 18:14:55, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 04/03/2012 02:32 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
This patch adds the
On 04/03/2012 04:29 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Please explain why this CAN controller cannot be handled by the existing
C_CAN driver, eventually with some extensions. The register layout seems
almost identical, at least.
Wolfgang.
These are the some of the pointers I can say, why I had
On 03.04.2012 14:39, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Hi All,
Subject line of this patch should be
ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller
No, the d_can IP core is generally not limited to ARM.
can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller
would be perfectly fine.
The
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:03:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 04/03/2012 04:29 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Please explain why this CAN controller cannot be handled by the existing
C_CAN driver, eventually with some extensions. The register layout seems
almost identical, at least.
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for the comments,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:24:23, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 03.04.2012 14:39, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
Hi All,
Subject line of this patch should be
ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller
No, the d_can IP core is generally not
-...@vger.kernel.org;
net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Gole, Anant; Nori, Sekhar
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: AM33XX: CAN: d_can: Add support for
Bosch D_CAN controller
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:03:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 04/03/2012 04
12 matches
Mail list logo
