Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 20:44 + schrieb Woodruff, Richard:
> > From: Menon, Nishanth
> > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:44 AM
>
> > > If I688 is not needed on am335x, then it seems there are still some
> > > mysteries remaining with this erratum to unravel. Something like
> > >
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:10:45PM +, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:01 AM
>
> > So please help me to get this straight:
> >
> > Errata I688 only affects OMAP4 which is consequently the only user of
> >
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:01 AM
> So please help me to get this straight:
>
> Errata I688 only affects OMAP4 which is consequently the only user of
> omap_interconnect_sync() in it's WFI enter sequence, which in turn is
> the only
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:24 AM
> If you implement drivers using nothing but writel() and readl(), then your
> performance _will_ suck, but that's entirely the driver's fault.
Your above analysis seems correct.
Perhaps
Hello Robert,
> From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:r.schwe...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:50 PM
> > -1-
> > Barrier side effects of the patch may be beneficial for other reasons. But
> AM335x should be immune from this particular issue.
>
> Is this a matter of fact, or
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:44:29PM +, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > From: Menon, Nishanth
> > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:44 AM
>
> > > If I688 is not needed on am335x, then it seems there are still some
> > > mysteries remaining with this erratum to unravel. Something like
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:06:36PM +, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:r.schwe...@pengutronix.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:50 PM
> > > -1-
> > > Barrier side effects of the patch may be beneficial for other reasons.
> > > But
> > AM335x should be
* Bastian Stender [150925 05:40]:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/25/2015 02:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Stender wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender
> >>---
> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c |
On 09/25/2015 09:35 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Bastian Stender [150925 05:40]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/25/2015 02:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Stender wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender
> From: Menon, Nishanth
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:44 AM
> > If I688 is not needed on am335x, then it seems there are still some
> > mysteries remaining with this erratum to unravel. Something like
> > difference in the L3 implementation. Maybe somebody from TI can
> > investigate which
Hi,
On 09/25/2015 02:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Stender wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Stender wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
>
12 matches
Mail list logo