Hello Tony,
I need your comment/input - whether we need an additional file for NAND support
in ZOOM2/3?
In current codebase has a board-sdp-flash.c file. I think we can remove -sdp-
from board-sdp-flash.c and reuse the file for ZOOM boards or any other upcoming
board(s).
Advantage:
a. No
Tony,
Would you please check if there are no further comments and could you pull them
in?
1/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92220/
2/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92232/
3/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92221/
4/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92230/
5/8:
Tony,
Would you please check if there are no further comments and could you pull them
in?
1/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92220/
2/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92232/
3/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92221/
4/8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/92230/
5/8:
You post this mail in previous thread. Do not do that. ($SUBJECT is
same as last one).
Post it in different thread.
And why this is not posted as a series?
In fact these patches should be posted in two set of patches:
1. patches related to IRQ mode support
2. patches related ROM code ecc layout
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Vimal Singh vimal.neww...@gmail.com wrote:
You post this mail in previous thread. Do not do that. ($SUBJECT is
same as last one).
Post it in different thread.
And why this is not posted as a series?
In fact these patches should be posted in two set of
-Original Message-
From: Vimal Singh [mailto:vimal.neww...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2010-04-14 10:05
To: Ghorai, Sukumar
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nand support on omap3 boards
You post this mail in previous thread. Do not do that. ($SUBJECT is
same as last one
