Felipe
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >
> > >> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
> > >> supposed to work in
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03.04.2013 15:12, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >
> > Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het
> > volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>> On 03.04.2013 14:0
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>
> Felipe, could you explain the background on
On 03.04.2013 15:12, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wr
Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>
Felipe, could you explain the backgr
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
> >> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
> >> supposed to work in host mode at boot time wi
On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
>> supposed to work in host mode at boot time with the rework of the driver
>> you did for 3.7? It might just be me not unde
Hi Felipe,
On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> (sorry, being really busy lately)
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
>>> >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
>
Hi,
(sorry, being really busy lately)
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
> > >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
> > >> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know ho
On 19.03.2013 14:27, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
> >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
> >> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know how this usb
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
>> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
>> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
>> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know how this usb driver is
>> supposed to work in host mode without takin
On 08.03.2013 17:44, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 13:51, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely u
On 07.03.2013 13:51, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
"Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
>>> Daniel> type B p
On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
>> Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
>
Hi Peter,
On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
> Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
> Daniel> sniplet in accordance to the documentati
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
Daniel> sniplet in accordance to the documentation of the bindings:
Daniel>usb_otg_hs: usb@4740 {
Dan
On 02.03.2013 17:05, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 22:57 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>>
>> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>>> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>>>
I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
p
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 22:57 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>
> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
> >
> >> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
> >> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it d
On 01.03.2013 22:57, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>
> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>>
>>> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
>>> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for
Hi Afzal, everyone,
On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>
>> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
>> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for me.
>
>> So there is no host interface register
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for me.
> So there is no host interface registered. I'm unsure on how to fix this,
> and I didn't get an answe
>
> On 02.11.2012 17:31, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > This series adds usb support to am335x SoC's found on boards like
> > Beagle Bone. Here only first instance is supported, as currently
> > multiple phy's of same type is not supported (am335x has two USB2
> > phy's).
>
> I'm testing these patc
Hi Afzal,
On 02.11.2012 17:31, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> This series adds usb support to am335x SoC's found on boards like
> Beagle Bone. Here only first instance is supported, as currently
> multiple phy's of same type is not supported (am335x has two USB2
> phy's).
I'm testing these patches with
23 matches
Mail list logo
