Hi Tero,
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, tero.kri...@nokia.com wrote:
What is the current status with those idlest patches anyway?
They aren't completed yet, so they won't make it into 2.6.39. I hope to
get them in early in 2.6.40.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, tero.kri...@nokia.com wrote:
What is the reason for having the sleepdep for DSS powerdomain anyway?
At least I can't see any reason why the sleepdep for DSS should be set.
In my opinion it should be perfectly okay for DSS domain to idle
independently of MPU/CORE,
: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: cpuidle: prevent CORE power domain from
going to RET or OFF when DSS is on
Hi Tero,
tero.kri...@nokia.com writes:
[...]
+ /* If DSS is active, prevent CORE RET/OFF */
+ dss_state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(dss_pd);
+ if (dss_state == PWRDM_POWER_ON
+ core_next_state
tero.kri...@nokia.com writes:
[...]
+ /* If DSS is active, prevent CORE RET/OFF */
+ dss_state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(dss_pd);
+ if (dss_state == PWRDM_POWER_ON
+ core_next_state != PWRDM_POWER_ON)
+ core_next_state = PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE;
+
Due to sleepdeps/autodeps, when this
Hi Kevin,
-Original Message-
From: ext Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@ti.com]
Sent: 04 March, 2011 01:25
To: Paul Walmsley
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
Kristo Tero (Nokia-MS/Tampere)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: cpuidle: prevent CORE power domain
Hi Tero,
tero.kri...@nokia.com writes:
[...]
+ /* If DSS is active, prevent CORE RET/OFF */
+ dss_state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(dss_pd);
+ if (dss_state == PWRDM_POWER_ON
+ core_next_state != PWRDM_POWER_ON)
+ core_next_state = PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE;
+
Due to
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes:
From: Tero Kristo tero.kri...@nokia.com
Prevent the CORE power domain from entering RETENTION or OFF when DSS
is on. Otherwise, the display FIFO(s) may underflow due to the time
needed for the CORE to wake back up, causing tearing and unnecessary
