On Friday 14 September 2012, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> Small question here, in my v2 version I have specified both
> the compatible names lis3lv02d and lis331dlh is it fine or
> only one is sufficient?
>
> +static struct of_device_id lis3lv02d_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "st,lis3l
+Daniel
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:58:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 13:56:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 September 2012, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Why do you put the "reg" property here
> >
>
On Friday 14 September 2012, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 13:56:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 September 2012, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> >
> > Why do you put the "reg" property here
>
> Here I specified reg property because lis331dlh I2C slave address is 0x18.
>
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for the review,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 13:56:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > Add lis331dlh device tree data to am335x-evm.dts. In AM335x EVM
> > lis331dlh accelerometer is connected to I2C2 bus. So this patch
> > change the status
On Thursday 13 September 2012, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Add lis331dlh device tree data to am335x-evm.dts. In AM335x EVM
> lis331dlh accelerometer is connected to I2C2 bus. So this patch
> change the status to "okay" to use I2C2 bus. Also added all the
> required platform data to am335x-evm.
>
> Signe
