On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic cpufreq driver adjusts the jiffies as well.
Double adjustment leads to incorrect value being assigned to
-Original Message-
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:14 PM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy
: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic cpufreq driver adjusts the jiffies
...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic cpufreq driver
@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic
-Original Message-
From: Shilimkar, Santosh
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 6:16 PM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
, Sanjeev
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
