Kevin,
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@ti.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:47 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; p...@pwsan.com; Nishanth Menon
Subject: Re: [PATCHV2] OMAP4: OPP: add OMAP4460 definitions
Vishwanath Sripathy
Vishwa,
Vishwanath Sripathy vishwanath...@ti.com writes:
[...]
A quick glance now suggests it has a few minor problems.
- patch was not Cc's to linux-arm-kernel
- uses 44XX naming which is not used in l-o master
Sorry I did not get this point. What do you mean by 44XX naming?
I applied
My mailer seems to have goofed the from email-id. Pls ignore this email. I
have sent another patch correcting the same.
Vishwa
-Original Message-
From: y...@dbdp31.itg.ti.com [mailto:y...@dbdp31.itg.ti.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:23 AM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc:
Kevin/Paul,
I see that this patch is not queued for 3.1 merge window. Any
issues/comments on this patch?
Vishwa
-Original Message-
From: Vishwanath BS [mailto:vishwanath...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 11:11 AM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vishwanath BS; Nishanth Menon
Vishwanath Sripathy vishwanath...@ti.com writes:
I see that this patch is not queued for 3.1 merge window. Any
issues/comments on this patch?
I did not look at this patch as it came late in the development cycle.
A quick glance now suggests it has a few minor problems.
- patch was not Cc's
