> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:t...@atomide.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:10 AM
> To: Aggarwal, Anuj
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com;
> l...@slimlogic.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] Regulator: O
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:09:28AM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 10:45 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hello Anuj,
> >
> > First of all, I liked the idea of unifying the regulator definitions
> > for boards that use twl regulators.
> >
> > But I guess we need to improve a
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 10:45 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello Anuj,
>
> First of all, I liked the idea of unifying the regulator definitions
> for boards that use twl regulators.
>
> But I guess we need to improve a little bit.
>
> See following comments.
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:13:
Hello Anuj,
First of all, I liked the idea of unifying the regulator definitions
for boards that use twl regulators.
But I guess we need to improve a little bit.
See following comments.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:13:52AM +0100, ext Anuj Aggarwal wrote:
> A new file for TWL4030/TPS65950 is creat
Hi,
* Anuj Aggarwal [100112 01:12]:
> A new file for TWL4030/TPS65950 is created which has common supplies
> and regulator init data structures. They will be referenced from the
> various board-evm files depending upon the EVM requirements, using
> the twl4030-pmic.h header file.
Looks like this
