>>-Original Message-
>>From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>>[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mike
>>Chan
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:00 AM
>>To: Gadiyar, Anand
>>Cc: Kevin Hilman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:01:49AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
What if a driver knows that it cannot afford to let the PM layer
turn off the power domain at certain points of time (maybe as long
as a USB cable is connected). How can this be specified in terms
of a latency or throughput const
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Mike Chan writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Hilman
>> > wrote:
>> >> Mike Chan writes:
>> >>
>> >>> I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
>> >>> the resource framew
>
> From: Gopinath, Thara
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:20 PM
> To: Gadiyar, Anand; Kevin Hilman; Mike Chan
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley
> Subject: RE: Future of resource framework?
>
> >>-Origina
>>-Original Message-
>>From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>>[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>>Gadiyar, Anand
>>Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 8:32 AM
>>To: Kevin Hilman; Mike Chan
>>Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Mike Chan writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Hilman
> > wrote:
> >> Mike Chan writes:
> >>
> >>> I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
> >>> the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I am curious
> >>> what are
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> Mike Chan writes:
>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Hilman
>> wrote:
>>> Mike Chan writes:
>>>
I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I
Mike Chan writes:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Hilman
> wrote:
>> Mike Chan writes:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
>>> the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I am curious
>>> what are the replacements under consideration.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> Mike Chan writes:
>
>> I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
>> the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I am curious
>> what are the replacements under consideration. I am starting to see
>> simil
Mike Chan writes:
> I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
> the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I am curious
> what are the replacements under consideration. I am starting to see
> similar issues on other platforms (msm / tegra) so more generic
>
Mike Chan had written, on 05/20/2010 05:37 PM, the following:
I'm not sure if this has been discussed, yet but since it seems that
the resource framework will not be making it upstream, I am curious
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127206504624556&w=2 (we are getting to
the one month expiry date
11 matches
Mail list logo
