* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [110405 06:00]:
But the fact that Russell has already stated the next merge window is
strictly for code consolidation already puts a stop sign in front of
this patch :-) Still, Tony is the final judge.
Yes this would be for the next merge window. It is still
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Is
On 04/05/2011 03:19 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
*
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:23:12PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:19 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On
On 04/05/2011 03:30 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:23:12PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:19 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:10:41PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:34:08PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Exactly, adding a new feature. Let me put it this way: which bug or
regression are you fixing with this patch ?
I never claimed that it is fixing a bug/regression ;)
but you want this go into the RC cycle, which is strictly
Hi Felipe,
On 04/05/2011 03:38 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:34:08PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Exactly, adding a new feature. Let me put it this way: which bug or
regression are you fixing with this patch ?
I never claimed that it is fixing a bug/regression ;)
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:59:32PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:38 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:34:08PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Exactly, adding a new feature. Let me put it this way: which bug or
regression are you fixing with this
Hi Tony,
On 03/29/2011 10:33 PM, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichels...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
Hi,
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
the lp5523 chip? The chip driver itself is in the mainline kernel
since 2.6.37-rc2.
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Hi,
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
the lp5523 chip? The chip driver itself is in the mainline kernel
since 2.6.37-rc2.
Got a patch for that? As always, patches related to blinking leds
have a special high
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
the lp5523 chip? The chip driver itself is in the mainline kernel
since 2.6.37-rc2.
Got a patch for that?
* Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org [110329 11:13]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:36:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org [110329 10:26]:
Is there any reason, that the rx51 platform code does not support
the lp5523 chip? The chip driver itself is in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
