On Friday 28 November 2014 23:24:26 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141128 13:43]:
On Friday 28 November 2014 21:27:19 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Are you saying there are some issues with that?
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141204 10:36]:
see last mail in thread (I CCed you):
[PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible
There is already some layer for converting ATAGs to DTB and it is
in decompresser: arch/arm/boot/compressed/atags_to_fdt.c
I do not know
On Thursday 04 December 2014 19:40:34 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141204 10:36]:
see last mail in thread (I CCed you):
[PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when
possible
There is already some layer for converting ATAGs to DTB and
it is in
On Fri 2014-11-28 12:27:19, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141127 03:34]:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Thinking about this probably the best long term solution is
to pass optional board_revision in the kernel cmdline that
can
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:52:04 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-11-28 12:27:19, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141127 03:34]:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Thinking about this probably the best long term solution is to pass
On Friday 28 November 2014 21:27:19 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141127 03:34]:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Thinking about this probably the best long term solution
is to pass optional board_revision in the kernel cmdline
that
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141127 03:34]:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Thinking about this probably the best long term solution is
to pass optional board_revision in the kernel cmdline that
can be parsed early and copied to system_rev variable.
On Friday 28 November 2014 21:27:19 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141127 03:34]:
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Thinking about this probably the best long term solution
is to pass optional board_revision in the kernel cmdline
that
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Does kernel provide some interface for telling userspace
applications something like bootreason (e.g power key, software
reset, rtc alarm, charger connected, ...)?
In N950/N9, NOLO passes this information using kernel command
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141128 13:43]:
On Friday 28 November 2014 21:27:19 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Are you saying there are some issues with that?
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot cannot read n900 onenand mtd (uboot onenand driver not
working,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot cannot read n900 onenand mtd (uboot onenand driver not
working, do not know why)
2) missing support for battery charging (can totally discharge
battery)
NOLO
On Friday 28 November 2014 23:24:26 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141128 13:43]:
On Friday 28 November 2014 21:27:19 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Are you saying there are some issues with that?
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot
On Friday 28 November 2014 23:26:30 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Does kernel provide some interface for telling userspace
applications something like bootreason (e.g power key,
software reset, rtc alarm, charger connected, ...)?
On Friday 28 November 2014 23:41:35 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot cannot read n900 onenand mtd (uboot onenand driver
not working, do not know why)
2) missing
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:49:00PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 28 November 2014 23:41:35 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
uboot (in mode when is loaded from NOLO) has those issues:
1) uboot cannot read n900 onenand mtd (uboot
8
From: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:55:29 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix n900 board name for legacy user space
N900 legacy user space apps need the board name in
/proc/cpuinfo to work properly for the Hardware entry.
For other boards
On Thursday 27 November 2014 02:12:04 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 15:40]:
With enabled CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB=y file /proc/atags is
missing.
OK I guess it should not be needed for DT based booting.
If I do not enable CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB=y then
On Tue 2014-10-28 01:01:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ pr_warn(WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to
boot with .dts\n);
+
Maybe use WARN so that the warning
* Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz [141126 09:31]:
On Tue 2014-10-28 01:01:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ pr_warn(WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to
boot with
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:19:35 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz [141126 09:31]:
On Tue 2014-10-28 01:01:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren
wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 10:59]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:19:35 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Maybe Pali can try to restart that discussion? To me it seems
the /proc/cpuinfo should be the same as it's a user
interface. Sorry forgot the details of the previous
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 20:10:28 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 10:59]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:19:35 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Maybe Pali can try to restart that discussion? To me it
seems the /proc/cpuinfo should be the same as it's a user
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 11:24]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 20:10:28 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 10:59]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:19:35 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Maybe Pali can try to restart that discussion? To me it
seems
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:08:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 11:24]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 20:10:28 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 10:59]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:19:35 Tony Lindgren
wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 15:03]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:08:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
With your patch I'm getting:
Hardware: Nokia RX-51 board
So patch is good.
Is that a Tested-by: then? :)
Revision comes from bootloader (via ATAG) and it is HW
On Thursday 27 November 2014 00:14:36 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 15:03]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:08:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
With your patch I'm getting:
Hardware: Nokia RX-51 board
So patch is good.
Is that a Tested-by:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [141126 15:40]:
With enabled CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB=y file /proc/atags is
missing.
OK I guess it should not be needed for DT based booting.
The build_tag_list() should parse ATAG_REVISION and then
parse_tag_revision() should copy it to system_rev.
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [141101 15:00]:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 17:46]:
However, these are minor compared to the dreadful poweroff behaviour.
Still going to have to disable DT booting for the LDP because of that.
Sure, I'll let you know as soon
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 17:46]:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:37:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Like I posted in this thread, I'm not seeing same errors as you are
with your config modified for DT:
http://muru.com/for-rmk/dmesg-ldp-dt-v3.18-rc2
Gah,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
We're moving omaps to use device tree based booting and already have
omap2, omap4, omap5, am335x and am437x booting in device tree only
mode.
Only omap3 still has legacy booting still around and we really want
to make that
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 12:32]:
Last night I tried enabling DT booting on the LDP. This resulted in
quite a horrid mess, so I don't think you're there still.
Thanks for trying. Other than the mystery battery issue, the others
should pretty much go away with
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [141031 14:16]:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 12:32]:
Last night I tried enabling DT booting on the LDP. This resulted in
quite a horrid mess, so I don't think you're there still.
Thanks for trying. Other than the mystery
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:13:26PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 12:32]:
Last night I tried enabling DT booting on the LDP. This resulted in
quite a horrid mess, so I don't think you're there still.
Thanks for trying. Other than
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 15:35]:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:13:26PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 12:32]:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c:2538
_init+0xc8/0x170()
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:37:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 15:35]:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:13:26PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141031 12:32]:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at
On 10/29/2014 05:31 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Also, you cannot expect all kernel users to know what you have been
talking about. E.g. OMAP DMA API deprecation may have been discussed
before, but I only learned it after the WARN appeared in the kernel tree.
So you should start counting from that.
On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi [141027 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ pr_warn(WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to
boot with
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:03AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi [141027 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+
* Sebastian Reichel s...@ring0.de [141029 12:01]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:03AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi [141027 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren
On 12:39-20141029, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichel s...@ring0.de [141029 12:01]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:03AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi [141027 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [141029 14:47]:
On 12:39-20141029, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sebastian Reichel s...@ring0.de [141029 12:01]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:03AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Aaro Koskinen
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:45:41PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12:39-20141029, Tony Lindgren wrote:
OK, you want me to guess? A hundred million days, or maybe ten more
minutes, somewhere in there, I just can't say, don't know.
How about ~1 year? We have been talking about dt only boot
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:39:16PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
8 ---
From: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:05:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Warn about deprecated legacy booting mode
We're moving omaps to use device tree based
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:39:16PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
From: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:05:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Warn about deprecated legacy booting mode
We're moving omaps to use device tree based booting and already have
omap2,
Hello Tony,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:39:16PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
From: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:05:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Warn about deprecated legacy booting
* Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi [141027 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ pr_warn(WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to
boot with .dts\n);
+
Maybe use WARN so that the
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ pr_warn(WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to
boot with .dts\n);
+
Maybe use WARN so that the warning is more verbose and kernel gets tainted?
A.
--
To
47 matches
Mail list logo
