On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2011-06-29 18:40:23, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
However only a
On Wed 2011-06-29 18:40:23, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
However only a small part of the code really needs to run from
+/*
+ * This function implements the erratum ID i581 WA:
+ * SDRC state restore before accessing the SDRAM
+ *
+ * Only used at return from non-OFF mode. For OFF
+ * mode the ROM code configures the SDRC and
+ * the DPLL before calling the restore code directly
+ * from DDR.
+ */
+
+/*
jean.pi...@newoldbits.com writes:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
This fix
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
jean.pi...@newoldbits.com writes:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
However only a small
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
the upcoming merge window?
Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
top of my code so far, and is untested. There isn't a need
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
the upcoming merge window?
Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:40:23PM +0200, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
@@ -309,7 +308,7 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void
*dev_id)
static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
{
- _omap_sram_idle(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
+
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
the upcoming merge window?
Yes -
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Jean,
Can you rebase/retest this on top of my pm-wip/idle-suspend branch,
which now contains Russell's major cleanup to use the common code as
well as an additional patch from me to remove the unncessary
Jean Pihet jean.pi...@newoldbits.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Jean,
Can you rebase/retest this on top of my pm-wip/idle-suspend branch,
which now contains Russell's major cleanup to use the common code as
well as an
jean.pi...@newoldbits.com writes:
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM and run from there.
However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
This fix lets most of the ASM idle
On 6/17/2011 2:22 PM, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
From: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM and run from there.
However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
This fix lets most
14 matches
Mail list logo
