Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-12 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still need the following: - memblock fixes - this series to fix the control module related issues - platform data

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-12 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com [101012 03:52]: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still need the following: - memblock fixes -

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: Add two functions for OMAP2430/OMAP3 IVA2 DSP boot control.  These registers wound up in the System Control Module.  Other kernel code that wishes to control the DSP's boot process should now use these functions to do so;

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Paul Walmsley
(adding Tony) On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: Add two functions for OMAP2430/OMAP3 IVA2 DSP boot control.  These registers wound up in the System Control Module.  Other kernel code that wishes to control

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [101011 13:45]: (adding Tony) On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote: Add two functions for OMAP2430/OMAP3 IVA2 DSP boot control.  These registers wound up in the System Control

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still need the following: - memblock fixes - this series to fix the control module related issues - platform data for the boards Is that all, or are we also missing something else?

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Omar Ramirez Luna
On 10/11/2010 4:35 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still need the following: - memblock fixes - this series to fix the control module related issues - platform data for the boards Is that all,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Paul Walmsley
A few other items: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote: A few other things should be done also. 1. Most of the code in drivers/staging/tidspbridge/code/tiomap3430.c in the bridge_brd_monitor(), bridge_brd_start(), and bridge_brd_stop() should be moved into a file in

Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: control: add functions for DSP boot address/mode control

2010-10-11 Thread Omar Ramirez Luna
On 10/11/2010 5:16 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: 4. If the DSP uses a peripheral, such as a GPTIMER or a McBSP, DSPBridge needs to reserve that device with the rest of Linux so some other Linux code isn't using it or doesn't try to use it, causing conflicts with DSPBridge. I guess the list that we