On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
.speaking of which, clk_set_rate has been overhauled and is now
recursive. *collective groan*. clk_set_rate is still simple for the
common case of
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
[...]
.the most notable change is the removal of struct clk_hw.
Happy to see that.
This extra
layer of abstraction is only necessary if we want hide the definition of
struct clk from platform code. Many developers expressed
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
.sysfs support. Visualize your clk tree at /sys/clk! Where would be
a better place to put the clk tree besides the root of /sys/?
Um, in the proper place for it under /sys/devices like the rest of the
device tree is?
When a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:42:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
.sysfs support. Visualize your clk tree at /sys/clk! Where would be
a better place to put the clk tree besides the root of /sys/?
Um, in the proper place for it
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:42:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
.sysfs support. Visualize your clk tree at /sys/clk! Where would be
a better
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:09:29AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:42:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:40:42PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
.sysfs
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:12:26AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:09:29AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
If others also agree that it should reside only in debugfs then I'll
move it there for V4.
If it's only for debug stuff, then yes, it belongs in debugfs. All
distros
