On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I think Thomas was suggesting that you consider creating a option for
where CLOCK_MONOTONIC included total_sleep_time.
In that case the *hack* (and this is a hack, we'll need some more
thoughtful discussion before
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 00:46 -0700, Suresh Rajashekara wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I think Thomas was suggesting that you consider creating a option for
where CLOCK_MONOTONIC included total_sleep_time.
In that case the *hack* (and this is
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, john stultz wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 00:46 -0700, Suresh Rajashekara wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I think Thomas was suggesting that you consider creating a option for
where CLOCK_MONOTONIC included
Hello Suresh,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:50:39 -0700
Suresh Rajashekara suresh.raj+linuxo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an application (running on 2.6.29-omap1) which puts an OMAP1
system to suspend aggressively. The system wakes up every 4 seconds
and stays awake for about 35 milliseconds and sleeps
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Though we could change that conditionally - the default would still be
the freeze of jiffies and CLOCK_MONOTONIC for historical compability.
If I were to change it only for our implementation, and make all the
user space
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 23:34 -0700, Suresh Rajashekara wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Though we could change that conditionally - the default would still be
the freeze of jiffies and CLOCK_MONOTONIC for historical compability.
If I were to
I have an application (running on 2.6.29-omap1) which puts an OMAP1
system to suspend aggressively. The system wakes up every 4 seconds
and stays awake for about 35 milliseconds and sleeps again for another
4 seconds. This design is to save power on a battery operated device.
This aggressive
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Suresh Rajashekara wrote:
I have an application (running on 2.6.29-omap1) which puts an OMAP1
system to suspend aggressively. The system wakes up every 4 seconds
and stays awake for about 35 milliseconds and sleeps again for another
4 seconds. This design is to save power
