On 06/14/2012 10:17 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Sorry for jumping in so late in the game. But I think, the model, to which
> this discussion is slowly converging, is not very well suitable for the
> shdma DMACs, present on SH and ARM sh-mobile SoCs. I might be wrong and
> the
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Yep, but for that I'd rather add a flag than a information that is a
> duplication of the parent data.
Great, send a patch.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.ke
On 06/11/2012 07:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Add one-register-per-pin type device tree based pinctrl driver.
>
> Currently this driver only works on omap2+ series of processors,
> where there is either an 8 or 16-bit padconf register for each pin.
> Support for other similar pinmux controllers c
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 8:04 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
(attribution lost)
> > > > Furthermore, the PRCM will never request target idle for this IP block
> > > > while the kernel is running, due to the sleep depende
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> What does make this a bit more difficult is the function
> gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks(). It appears to convert nanoseconds to ticks and
> back to nanoseconds. I am guessing to account for some rounding error. I
> am curious what impact this function is having o
Hi Jean-Philippe,
Thanks for the notes. I agree whole-heartedly with the idea that we're having a
hardware issue. I'm just trying to eliminate any other software-related issues
if I can. Since I'm really just a software engineer, I have to leave the
hardware work to the hardware folks. All I ca
On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable()
instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare()
instead of clk_disable()
Based on initial changes from Mike turquette
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 22:23:37, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Sounds like the tusb6010 non-ns tick value is the only remaining
> issue.
t.clk_activation = gpmc_ticks_to_ns(1);
was used so that gpmc_cs_set_timings would do gpmc_ns_to_ticks over
it & hence effectively 1 tick would get progra
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:12:46, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> But I am unable to find reason for failure upon using
> gpmc_ticks_to_ns(1), which seems to me right thing to be used.
> Let me try to invoke tusb6010 functions in beagle board,
> observe timings so that at least I will get an id
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 23:23:48, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 12:40 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > During gpmc driver probe, it will configure all the connected peripherals,
> > if configuration details are not present at that point of time, gpmc driver
> > will cry out saying that
201 - 210 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
