On 11/12/12 08:38, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 17:05:07, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/12 20:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/08/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 11:58 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:25:49, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2012 12:06 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:28:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/08/2012 11:47 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:09:57, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 17:05:07, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>
>
> On 11/08/12 20:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >
> > On 11/08/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/08/2012 11:58 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
On 11/09/2012 10:28:59 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I'm not actually opposed to it, but it needs to be done in an elegant
way. The DT data model already imposes more of a conceptual le
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:57:27PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> + pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl))
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "unable to select pin group\n");
>> +
>
>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Mark Brown
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:54:00AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> For the pin hogging I'd actually been thinking separately that we should
>> just have the device core do a devm_pinctrl
On 11/08/12 20:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/08/2012 11:58 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Igor was mentioning a h/w scenario where the 32kHz source is no
On 11/08/12 21:16, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2012 12:59 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 00:24:23, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/08/2012 01:59 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
There is no reliable way to determine which source should be used in
>>>
On 11/08/12 18:16, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2012 01:59 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 23:36, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Igor,
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2012 08:42 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER is kind of standing on the single zImage way.
Make OMAP2+ timer code indep
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We need to move the iommu code to live under drivers
> for arm common zImage support.
For the iommu changes in the entire series:
Acked-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
Joerg, it might relieve some pain if this will go through Tony's tree,
as there are
On 11/08/12 18:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Igor Grinberg [121107 23:15]:
>> On 11/07/12 19:33, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>> I think this should be the default for the timers as that counter
>>> does not stop during deeper idle states.
>>
>> Well, it is the default as you can see from the patch.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
