On 06/05/2015 05:35 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 22:52:47 +0300
Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Geert,
On 05/19/2015 12:38 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 PM, grygorii.stras...@linaro.org
grygorii.stras...@linaro.org
Hello Paul,
On 01-06-15 19:44, Paul Walmsley wrote:
The best way to make this work IMHO would be for us not to accept any new
feature addition patches as long as there are warnings reported in the
test results. The only real exception that I would foresee is if those
warnings are due to
On 05-06-15 10:01, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
Hello Paul,
On 01-06-15 19:44, Paul Walmsley wrote:
The best way to make this work IMHO would be for us not to accept any
new
feature addition patches as long as there are warnings reported in the
test results. The only real exception that I would
On 05/06/15 00:02, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi folks
just a brief comment on this one:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but -round_rate()
(which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
value (errors are
Hi Jon,
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:46:09 +0100
Jon Hunter jonath...@nvidia.com wrote:
On 05/06/15 00:02, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi folks
just a brief comment on this one:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but -round_rate()
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:20:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [150604 10:11]:
* Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org [150604 10:03]:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
arm-allmodconfig
On 06/05/2015 06:34 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
The ti-dma-crossbar driver in it's current form can work when it is used with
sDMA (omap-dma). On DRA7x class of devices we have both sDMA and eDMA
available.
The DT bindings for sDMA has been done in a way that DMA users need to specify
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:20:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 06/04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:18:25PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:08:50PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:46:59AM +0200, Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:49:00PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:20:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Greg, there's now commit 9809889c708e in tty-linus and commit
9e91597f2423 in tty-next.
Yes, I can't go back and remove the one in tty-next, I'm guessing when
From: Misael Lopez Cruz misael.lo...@ti.com
eDMA crossbar works exactly the same way as sDMA, but sDMA
requires an offset of 1, while no offset is needed for eDMA.
Signed-off-by: Misael Lopez Cruz misael.lo...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
Currently the driver can be used with sDMA only due to the fact that the
sDMA bindings are using real DMA_REQ + 1 indexing of the DMA requests.
This is not a case with the eDMA for example so the driver in current form
can not handle the case when it is used with eDMA.
Be precise with the
From: Misael Lopez Cruz misael.lo...@ti.com
In preparation for supporting multiple DMA crossbar instances,
make the idr xbar instance specific.
Signed-off-by: Misael Lopez Cruz misael.lo...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 9
Hi,
The ti-dma-crossbar driver in it's current form can work when it is used with
sDMA (omap-dma). On DRA7x class of devices we have both sDMA and eDMA available.
The DT bindings for sDMA has been done in a way that DMA users need to specify
the required DMA request number + 1 when they request
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 23:02:25 + (UTC)
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi folks
just a brief comment on this one:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but -round_rate()
(which returns a rounded rate from a
14 matches
Mail list logo
