On 09/25/2013 10:52:44 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Rob Landley r...@landley.net writes:
On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer
instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex.
Meaning I play whack-a-mole
On 09/25/2013 11:13:17 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Rob Landley wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer
instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex.
Meaning I play whack
On 09/25/2013 03:49:07 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
It could be as simple as making gas accept an extra argument for
instructions
On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Rob Landley wrote:
On 09/24/2013 04:48:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Now, if you feel strongly about this, we _could_ introduce a
CONFIG_OLD_BINUTILS and give everyone their cake - but it will be
fragile
On 09/24/2013 07:11:38 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Rob Landley r...@landley.net writes:
On 09/23/2013 06:59:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
During 3.12-rc, Will Deacon introduced code into arch/arm that
requires binutils 2.22.
Um, my toolchain is using the last gplv2 snapshot of binutils out
On 09/24/2013 04:48:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:23:48PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
What value is there in requiring the new toolchain? From what I
could
see of the commits it was micro-optimizations around memory
barriers.
*shrug* I can revert
On 09/23/2013 06:59:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
During 3.12-rc, Will Deacon introduced code into arch/arm that
requires binutils 2.22.
Um, my toolchain is using the last gplv2 snapshot of binutils out of
git, which is just past 2.17 and can build armv7 (but not armv8).
Binutils 2.12-2.22 is
On 09/23/2013 06:59:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
During 3.12-rc, Will Deacon introduced code into arch/arm that
requires binutils 2.22.
I'm sorry, it occurs to me I should have been more explicit:
HH! KILL IT WITH
FIRE!!!
Rob--
To
On 02/19/2013 09:05:00 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Greg, can you pitch your suggestion here ? It would be great to hear
your rationale behind dropping class infrastructure, couldn't find
anything through Google and since feature-removal-schedule.txt has
been
removed (without adding it to
On 02/18/2013 11:53:14 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
The PHY framework provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers to
create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference
to the
PHY with or without using phandle. To obtain a reference to the PHY
without
using phandle, the
On 01/04/2013 01:31:10 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Introduce DT overlay support.
Using this functionality it is possible to dynamically overlay a part
of
the kernel's tree with another tree that's been dynamically loaded.
It is also possible to remove node and properties.
Signed-off-by:
On 01/05/2013 03:35:58 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documented
On 11/09/2012 10:28:59 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren
swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I'm not actually opposed to it, but it needs to be done in an elegant
way. The DT data model already imposes
On 06/07/2012 06:09 AM, Russell King wrote:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Monday 12 July 2010 18:18:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
2010/7/12 David Brown dav...@codeaurora.org:
Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
nice to be able to make small defconfigs for those
15 matches
Mail list logo
