Hi,
On 24 May 2012 10:44, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
On 5/2/2012 7:42 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Omar,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the
On 5/2/2012 7:42 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Omar,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you
had proposed earlier
Hi Tony, Benoit,
On 1 May 2012 12:47, Omar Ramirez Luna omar.l...@linaro.org wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
Omar Ramirez Luna (2):
OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support
arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes
Hi Vaibhav,
Somehow I missed this mail.
On 2 May 2012 00:42, Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Omar,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
Omar Ramirez Luna (2):
OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support
arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/mailbox.txt |9 +
Hi Omar,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you
had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is added.
