Paul,
On 16/07/15 04:47, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Roger
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
>> _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
>> on those modules after the module is e
Hi Roger
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Roger Quadros wrote:
> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
> _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
> on those modules after the module is enabled.
>
> This can potentially cause a bus access error
There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
_find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
on those modules after the module is enabled.
This can potentially cause a bus access error if the module is accessed
before the module is ready.
Get rid
On 14/01/15 01:46, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>>> From: Paul Walmsley
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:49:57 -0700
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Only skip ioremap() if IP block does not have OCP header
>>> registers. Experimental.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/om
Hi Paul,
On 01/13/2015 05:29 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Suman,
>
> thanks for pitching in on this!
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> You have removed the return from the above block on failure. If any DT
>> entry doesn't have the reg property, this will hang the kernel boot.
>>
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > From: Paul Walmsley
> > Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:49:57 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] Only skip ioremap() if IP block does not have OCP header
> > registers. Experimental.
> >
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 33 +--
Hi Suman
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Suman Anna wrote:
> Looking at your rc3 log @
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc3/20150105224749/boot/4460varsomom/,
> I do see a missing reg entry for mailbox, and that's the reason for your
> hang because of the missing bail out in your new patch.
>
Hi Suman,
thanks for pitching in on this!
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Suman Anna wrote:
> You have removed the return from the above block on failure. If any DT
> entry doesn't have the reg property, this will hang the kernel boot.
> Just remove the "reg" entry from any of the existing DT, and you will
On 06/01/15 04:04, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
>
> It passes all the basic tests here except it does not boot on the 4460
> VAR-SOM-OM - unclear why at this point - but it would be good to see if it
> works on your AM4372 boards, since I don't have th
On 01/06/2015 11:27 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 01/06/2015 11:14 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On 01/06/2015 02:14 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 07:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
>>> Y
Hi Paul,
On 01/06/2015 11:14 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 01/06/2015 02:14 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 07:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>
>>> Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
>> Yep, the below patch works on AM437x.
>> Boot logs here:
Hi Paul,
On 01/06/2015 02:14 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 07:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>> Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
> Yep, the below patch works on AM437x.
> Boot logs here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9680938/
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Lok
Hi Paul,
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 07:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
Yep, the below patch works on AM437x.
Boot logs here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9680938/
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
>
> It passes all the basic tests here except it does not boot o
Roger, Lokesh, could you try this one instead?
It passes all the basic tests here except it does not boot on the 4460
VAR-SOM-OM - unclear why at this point - but it would be good to see if it
works on your AM4372 boards, since I don't have that one.
Test logs are here:
http://www.pwsan.com/o
On 1/5/15 2:19 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
+ Santosh
Hi Lokesh
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 02:40 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysc
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Suman Anna wrote:
> That's right, the test was present even before 6423d6df1440, I merely
> made this a block.
Indeed, I misread the commit. Sorry about ihat.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord.
+ Santosh
Hi Lokesh
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> On Saturday 03 January 2015 02:40 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
> >
On 01/05/2015 02:35 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Saturday 03 January 2015 02:40 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> + Suman, lakml
>>
>> Hi Roger
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> -roger
>>>
>>> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros
Hi Paul,
On Saturday 03 January 2015 02:40 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> + Suman, lakml
>
> Hi Roger
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>>
>> cheers,
>> -roger
>>
>> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have s
+ Suman, lakml
Hi Roger
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
> > _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing
* Roger Quadros [141219 01:08]:
> Lokesh,
>
> On 19/12/14 07:21, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> > On Thursday 18 December 2014 09:22 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Fixing up Paul's email id.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> -roger
> >>
> >> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> There are quite
Lokesh,
On 19/12/14 07:21, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> On Thursday 18 December 2014 09:22 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>>
>> cheers,
>> -roger
>>
>> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
>>
Hi Roger,
On Thursday 18 December 2014 09:22 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
>> _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing r
Fixing up Paul's email id.
cheers,
-roger
On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
> _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
> on those modules after the module is enabled.
>
> This can poten
There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
_find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
on those modules after the module is enabled.
This can potentially cause a bus access error if the module is accessed
before the module is ready.
Get rid
25 matches
Mail list logo
