Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check for enabled PRCM IRQs

2010-04-27 Thread Mike Turquette
Kevin Hilman wrote: commit cfabe8a950e252d26cdeb4a9bb11e2cabb2a50c6 Author: Kevin Hilman Date: Mon Apr 26 14:59:09 2010 -0700 OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check and clear enabled PRCM IRQs While handling PRCM IRQs, mask out interrupts that are not enabled in PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU

Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check for enabled PRCM IRQs

2010-04-27 Thread Kevin Hilman
Mike Turquette writes: > Kevin Hilman wrote: >> While handling PRCM IRQs, mask out interrupts that are not enabled in >> PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU. If these are not masked out, non-enabled >> interrupts are caught and a WARN() is dumped. >> >> This was noticed using SmartReflex transitions which cause

Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check for enabled PRCM IRQs

2010-04-26 Thread Mike Turquette
Turquette, Mike wrote: Kevin Hilman wrote: While handling PRCM IRQs, mask out interrupts that are not enabled in PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU. If these are not masked out, non-enabled interrupts are caught and a WARN() is dumped. This was noticed using SmartReflex transitions which cause the VPx_* inter

Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check for enabled PRCM IRQs

2010-04-26 Thread Mike Turquette
Kevin Hilman wrote: While handling PRCM IRQs, mask out interrupts that are not enabled in PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU. If these are not masked out, non-enabled interrupts are caught and a WARN() is dumped. This was noticed using SmartReflex transitions which cause the VPx_* interrupts to be handled sinc

[PATCH] OMAP3: PRCM interrupt: only check for enabled PRCM IRQs

2010-04-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
While handling PRCM IRQs, mask out interrupts that are not enabled in PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU. If these are not masked out, non-enabled interrupts are caught and a WARN() is dumped. This was noticed using SmartReflex transitions which cause the VPx_* interrupts to be handled since they are set in PRM_