Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-25 Thread NeilBrown
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:32:18 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Yep, I don't think so. In any case, all this is to be deprecated, and as soon as omapdrm driver works reliably that should be the driver to use. How close is that? Is it worth experimenting yet? Is there an xorg

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-25 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, On 24/02/15 22:31, NeilBrown wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:40:32 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the xorg X server on my

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-25 Thread NeilBrown
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:49:58 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 22:31, NeilBrown wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:40:32 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-25 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 25/02/15 11:20, NeilBrown wrote: Tested-by: NeilBrown ne...@suse.de Before the patch: # ls -l /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 8 12:57 /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display0 - ../spi_lcd/spi_master/spi32766/spi32766.0 After the patch: # ls

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:40:32 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the xorg X server on my device as it couldn't find the

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Lindgren
* NeilBrown ne...@suse.de [150224 12:35]: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:40:32 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the

[PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread NeilBrown
commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the xorg X server on my device as it couldn't find the display any more. It needs the 'name' file and now there isn't one. That commit claims that 'name' is not compatible with i2c or spi. i2c

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the xorg X server on my device as it couldn't find the display any more. It needs the 'name' file and now there isn't one. That commit claims

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
I have tested it with X.Org X Server 1.12.4 Release Date: 2012-08-27 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux 3.2.0-4-mx5 armv7l Debian (coming from Debian Wheezy) on: * gta04 (SPI panel) * openpandora (SPI panel) * BeagleBoard XM (with RGB panel) * PandaBoard ES (w/o

Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: restore name sysfs entry.

2015-02-24 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 24/02/15 22:31, NeilBrown wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:40:32 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/02/15 11:37, NeilBrown wrote: commit 303e4697e762dc92a40405f4e4b8aac02cd0d70b OMAPDSS: rename display-sysfs 'name' entry broke the xorg X server on my