Re: [PATCH] PRCM: Combine 34xx l3_icks and l4_icks

2008-04-29 Thread Högander Jouni
out. I checked caḿ_l3_ick, cam_l4_ick, usbhost_l3_ick, usbhost_l4_ick. Yes, your patch needs to be applied if [PATCH] PRCM: Combine 34xx l3_icks and l4_icks is applied. Could you check, please: From 4102f3ad5db10e662633c0f9ddee6aca43fec8e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felipe Balbi [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] PRCM: Combine 34xx l3_icks and l4_icks

2008-04-29 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Högander Jouni wrote: E.g dss_l3_ick and dss_l4_ick have same gating control. Having own clock for both of them causes race condition between enable / disable. This patch combines this kind of clocks and names new clock as module_ick. Signed-off-by: Jouni Hogander

Re: [PATCH] PRCM: Combine 34xx l3_icks and l4_icks

2008-04-29 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080428 23:58]: On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Högander Jouni wrote: E.g dss_l3_ick and dss_l4_ick have same gating control. Having own clock for both of them causes race condition between enable / disable. This patch combines this kind of clocks and names new

Re: [PATCH] PRCM: Combine 34xx l3_icks and l4_icks

2008-04-28 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:29:53 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Högander Jouni) wrote: E.g dss_l3_ick and dss_l4_ick have same gating control. Having own clock for both of them causes race condition between enable / disable. This patch combines this kind of clocks and names new clock as module_ick.