* Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org [150531 15:14]:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com [150526 07:14]:
On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The currently in-use port-startup and
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com [150526 07:14]:
On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The currently in-use port-startup and port-shutdown are okay. The
startup part for instance does the tiny omap
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com [150526 07:14]:
On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The currently in-use port-startup and port-shutdown are okay. The
startup part for instance does the tiny omap
* Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com [150526 07:14]:
On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The currently in-use port-startup and port-shutdown are okay. The
startup part for instance does the tiny omap extra part and invokes
serial8250_do_startup() for the remaining
On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The currently in-use port-startup and port-shutdown are okay. The
startup part for instance does the tiny omap extra part and invokes
serial8250_do_startup() for the remaining pieces. The workflow in
serial8250_do_startup() is okay
The currently in-use port-startup and port-shutdown are okay. The
startup part for instance does the tiny omap extra part and invokes
serial8250_do_startup() for the remaining pieces. The workflow in
serial8250_do_startup() is okay except for the part where UART_RX is
read without a check if there
