Hi Omar,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna
wrote:
> Yes, I made the changes, for tidspbridge and remoteproc, I will submit
> both for review, based on this series.
Great, thanks.
Please note that when we do eventually merge this, we need your
updates to be squashed into Loic's
Hi Loic/Ohad,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>
>
> On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
>>> remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform
On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
>> remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
>> reduce dependencies a little? Either way works,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
> remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
> reduce dependencies a little? Either way works, but it'd be nice to
> keep them independent if we can
* Olof Johansson [121220 11:22]:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Linus Walleij [121220 10:19]:
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
> >> > with some coproce
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Linus Walleij [121220 10:19]:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
>> wrote:
>>
>> > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
>> > with some coprocessors.
>> > Based on OMAP existing mailbox frame
* Linus Walleij [121220 10:19]:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
> wrote:
>
> > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
> > with some coprocessors.
> > Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
> > generic framework, living unde
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
wrote:
> OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
> with some coprocessors.
> Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
> generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox.
I like this patch series so
OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
with some coprocessors.
Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox.
This series:
- moves omap-mailbox framework to a newly drivers/mailbox folder
(part of pl
