On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 06:13:06PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:18:45PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:25:31PM +0530, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
> > > which
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:18:45PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:25:31PM +0530, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
> > which should now work correctly on OMAP1 platforms thanks to Tony's
> > testing.
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:25:31PM +0530, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
> which should now work correctly on OMAP1 platforms thanks to Tony's
> testing.
>
> It would be good to get this validated by others across a range of
> O
On Monday 10 February 2014 09:25 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
> which should now work correctly on OMAP1 platforms thanks to Tony's
> testing.
>
> It would be good to get this validated by others across a range of
> OMAP p
* Russell King - ARM Linux [140210 07:58]:
> This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
> which should now work correctly on OMAP1 platforms thanks to Tony's
> testing.
>
> It would be good to get this validated by others across a range of
> OMAP platforms, and queued up f
This is the current set of patches for the OMAP DMA engine rework,
which should now work correctly on OMAP1 platforms thanks to Tony's
testing.
It would be good to get this validated by others across a range of
OMAP platforms, and queued up for the next merge window, so it can
be built upon.
Acks
