Hi Paul,
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:47 -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Igor,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Igor Stoppa wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 13:44 -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
True, but if we can do a debugfs implementation first, then that seems
like a good way to start, no?
Hello Hiroshi,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
debugfs can provide the infrastructure to trace the dependencies of
clock tree hierarchy quite visibly. This patch enables to keep track
of clock tree hierarchy and expose their attributes under each clock
directry as below:
As a
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote:
But it would be nice to be able to call into clock functions like
round_rate, set_rate, and set_parent via filesystem writes for debugging
purposes, and I don't think that debugfs supports this.
It does, if you set up the files properly ...
Hello David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote:
But it would be nice to be able to call into clock functions like
round_rate, set_rate, and set_parent via filesystem writes for debugging
purposes, and I don't think that debugfs
Hi,
From: ext Paul Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: CLKFW: Initial debugfs support for omap
clock framework
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:45:02 -0600 (MDT)
Hello David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote
Hello David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
struct dentry *debugfs_create_file(const char *name, mode_t mode,
struct dentry *parent, void *data,
const struct file_operations *fops);
... provide a
Hello Hiroshi, David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
And if there will be a little possibility that sysfs attribute can be
used by userland in the future, keeping sysfs instead of debugfs
doesn't seem not so illegal, does it?
Hi all,
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 13:44 -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Hiroshi, David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
And if there will be a little possibility that sysfs attribute can be
used by userland in the future,
From: ext Paul Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: CLKFW: Initial debugfs support for omap
clock framework
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:44:04 -0600 (MDT)
Hello Hiroshi, David,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote
Hello Igor,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Igor Stoppa wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 13:44 -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
True, but if we can do a debugfs implementation first, then that seems
like a good way to start, no? Userspace PM implementations are probably
some months in the future, and
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Userspace should limit itself to changing policies.
CPUFreq is good, but it does not manage non-CPU-frequency knobs very well,
and there are plenty of those on OMAP3.
Similar issues are widely acknowledged.
Is there any reason why we
11 matches
Mail list logo
