Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 18 September 2011 11:45:16 Randy Dunlap wrote: We have fallbacks to Andrew and/or GregKH currently, but GregKH is not consistent or timely with applying drivers/misc/ patches. It deserves better. [added him to Cc: list] I do try to handle patches sent to me for misc/ in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-19 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:47:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Sunday 18 September 2011 11:45:16 Randy Dunlap wrote: We have fallbacks to Andrew and/or GregKH currently, but GregKH is not consistent or timely with applying drivers/misc/ patches. It deserves better. [added him to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 19 September 2011, Greg KH wrote: That sounds good to me, I'll be glad to collect the patches and push them to Linus for both of those trees (might as well keep them in the same git tree, no need to separate them, right?) and I'll rely on you for review and acking them. Much like I

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/05/2011 07:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I think it would simply be more consistent to have it enabled all the time. Well, even better would be to move the bulk of the misc drivers to a proper location sorted by their subsystems. A lot of them should never have been merged in their current

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-18 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:11:45AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 09/05/2011 07:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I think it would simply be more consistent to have it enabled all the time. Well, even better would be to move the bulk of the misc drivers to a proper location sorted by their

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/18/2011 08:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:11:45AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 09/05/2011 07:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I think it would simply be more consistent to have it enabled all the time. Well, even better would be to move the bulk of the misc drivers to a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-05 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Arnd, On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:43:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Since misc devices have nothing in common besides fitting in no other category, there is no need to group them in one Kconfig symbol. Simply removing the symbol gets rid of all sorts of Kconfig warnings about missing

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 05 September 2011, Jean Delvare wrote: As said before, I'm not sure. Yes, it makes it easier to select misc device drivers from Kconfig files. But it also makes it impossible to deselect all misc device drivers at once. I think that what we really need is the implementation in the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-05 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:19:35 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 05 September 2011, Jean Delvare wrote: As said before, I'm not sure. Yes, it makes it easier to select misc device drivers from Kconfig files. But it also makes it impossible to deselect all misc device drivers at once.

[PATCH 1/2] misc: remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

2011-09-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Since misc devices have nothing in common besides fitting in no other category, there is no need to group them in one Kconfig symbol. Simply removing the symbol gets rid of all sorts of Kconfig warnings about missing dependencies when another driver selects a misc driver without also selecting