ti/clk-divider.c does not calculate the rates consistently at the moment.

As an example, on OMAP3 we have a clock divider with a source clock of
864000000 Hz. With dividers 6, 7 and 8 the theoretical rates are:

6: 144000000
7: 123428571.428571...
8: 108000000

Calling clk_round_rate() with the rate in the first column will give the
rate in the second column:

144000000 -> 144000000
143999999 -> 123428571
123428572 -> 123428571
123428571 -> 108000000

Note how clk_round_rate() returns 123428571 for rates from 123428572 to
143999999, which is mathematically correct, but when clk_round_rate() is
called with 123428571, the returned value is surprisingly 108000000.

This means that the following code works a bit oddly:

rate = clk_round_rate(clk, 123428572);
clk_set_rate(clk, rate);

As clk_set_rate() also does clock rate rounding, the result is that the
clock is set to the rate of 108000000, not 123428571 returned by the
clk_round_rate.

This patch changes the ti/clk-divider.c to use DIV_ROUND_UP when
calculating the rate. This gives the following behavior which fixes the
inconsistency:

144000000 -> 144000000
143999999 -> 123428572
123428572 -> 123428572
123428571 -> 108000000

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com>
---
 drivers/clk/ti/divider.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c b/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
index a15e445570b2..e6aa10db7bba 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned long ti_clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct 
clk_hw *hw,
                return parent_rate;
        }
 
-       return parent_rate / div;
+       return DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, div);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int ti_clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, 
unsigned long rate,
                }
                parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk),
                                MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i));
-               now = parent_rate / i;
+               now = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, i);
                if (now <= rate && now > best) {
                        bestdiv = i;
                        best = now;
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static long ti_clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
unsigned long rate,
        int div;
        div = ti_clk_divider_bestdiv(hw, rate, prate);
 
-       return *prate / div;
+       return DIV_ROUND_UP(*prate, div);
 }
 
 static int ti_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int ti_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 
unsigned long rate,
        unsigned long flags = 0;
        u32 val;
 
-       div = parent_rate / rate;
+       div = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
        value = _get_val(divider, div);
 
        if (value > div_mask(divider))
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to