Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: I was thinking I'll set up an immutable branch for the three pinctrl patches against -rc4 then both you and I can merge them in as needed. Does that work for you? Hm it's fair enough to have them in your tree if they do not

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-10 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [131010 08:43]: On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: I was thinking I'll set up an immutable branch for the three pinctrl patches against -rc4 then both you and I can merge them in as needed. Does that work for you?

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? Yes, after good explanations to my whimsical questions only this: Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org I guess you'll take these patches

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [131009 06:51]: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? Yes, after good explanations to my whimsical questions only this: Acked-by: Linus

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-08 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax, not semantics. The problems start with patch #4. I am tormented with mixed

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [131008 05:03]: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax, not semantics.

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-08 Thread Haojian Zhuang
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax,

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-07 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi Linus W, Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series? These are badly needed to not break omap3 PM support when we're moving to device tree based booting. * Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [131002 22:50]: Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc_data so we can

[PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

2013-10-02 Thread Tony Lindgren
Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc_data so we can support SoC specific features like pin wake-up events. Done in collaboration with Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com. Cc: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com Cc: Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com Cc: Prakash