Grant Likely writes:
>> Grant, after Tarun/Santosh have a chance to review/ack this, can you
>> still get this in for 3.5? If not, getting it into -rc should be fine.
>
> Yes. Do you have any other omap patches? Do you want to send me a
> pull req?
We just found one more fix needed.
I'm coll
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tarun, Santosh,
>
> Tarun Kanti DebBarma writes:
>
>> We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
>> to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
>> while doing the cleanup series.
>>
>> Just to make sure that we
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tony Lindgren writes:
>
>> * Kevin Hilman [120517 15:29]:
>>>
>>> I just noticed that this patch has caused some strange problems, notably
>>> with the GPIO IRQ used by smsc911x NIC (Overo, Zoom3, 2430SDP, etc. etc.)
>>>
>>> The patch itself
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tarun, Santosh,
>
> Tarun Kanti DebBarma writes:
>
>> We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
>> to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
>> while doing the cleanup series.
>>
>> Just to make sure that we
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tony Lindgren writes:
>
>> * Kevin Hilman [120517 15:29]:
>>>
>>> I just noticed that this patch has caused some strange problems, notably
>>> with the GPIO IRQ used by smsc911x NIC (Overo, Zoom3, 2430SDP, etc. etc.)
>>>
>>> The patch itself
* Kevin Hilman [120517 17:00]:
>
> Argh, then $SUBJECT patch here has caused brokeness in multiple ways.
> It managed to break both runtime suspend and runtime resume at the same
> time. :(
>
> The change added by this patch to runtime_suspend effectively disables
> the fix I did in 68942edb09 (
Tony Lindgren writes:
> * Kevin Hilman [120517 15:29]:
>>
>> I just noticed that this patch has caused some strange problems, notably
>> with the GPIO IRQ used by smsc911x NIC (Overo, Zoom3, 2430SDP, etc. etc.)
>>
>> The patch itself is OK, but it has exposed a bug in other parts of the
>> con
On Thu, 17 May 2012 15:21:07 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tarun, Santosh,
>
> Tarun Kanti DebBarma writes:
>
> > We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
> > to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
> > while doing the cleanup series.
> >
> > Just to make su
* Kevin Hilman [120517 15:29]:
>
> I just noticed that this patch has caused some strange problems, notably
> with the GPIO IRQ used by smsc911x NIC (Overo, Zoom3, 2430SDP, etc. etc.)
>
> The patch itself is OK, but it has exposed a bug in other parts of the
> context restore path that was previ
Tarun, Santosh,
Tarun Kanti DebBarma writes:
> We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
> to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
> while doing the cleanup series.
>
> Just to make sure that we do context restore correctly in
> *_runtime_resume(), the bank->
On Friday 27 April 2012 07:43 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
> to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
> while doing the cleanup series.
>
> Just to make sure that we do context restore correctly in
> *_runtime_resum
We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
while doing the cleanup series.
Just to make sure that we do context restore correctly in
*_runtime_resume(), the bank->workaround_enabled check is
moved after context restore. Ot
12 matches
Mail list logo
