Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] ARM: OMAP3+: support cpufreq-cpu0 for device tree boot

2013-03-28 Thread Benoit Cousson
Hi Nishanth, The patches 1 to 6 looks good to me. Beside the pretty long Cc list, that should not necessarily contain all the mailing list. Since you are changing / renaming some DTS files, and to avoid any merge conflict I will apply only these 6 patches. DTS and driver changes are in theory

Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] ARM: OMAP3+: support cpufreq-cpu0 for device tree boot

2013-03-28 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi Benoit, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com wrote: The patches 1 to 6 looks good to me. Beside the pretty long Cc list, that should not necessarily contain all the mailing list. Arrgh.. my bad. I will keep it in mind for the future. Since you are changing /

Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] ARM: OMAP3+: support cpufreq-cpu0 for device tree boot

2013-03-27 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Nishanth, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes: Hi, The following version 2 of the series arose from trying to use BeagleBoard-XM (OMAP3 variant) for doing CPU DVFS using cpufreq-cpu0. This series enables the generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver to be used in device tree enabled boot while

[PATCH V2 0/8] ARM: OMAP3+: support cpufreq-cpu0 for device tree boot

2013-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi, The following version 2 of the series arose from trying to use BeagleBoard-XM (OMAP3 variant) for doing CPU DVFS using cpufreq-cpu0. This series enables the generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver to be used in device tree enabled boot while maintaining support of the legacy omap-cpufreq driver when used