RE: [PATCH v5 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: holler if no configuration

2012-06-12 Thread Mohammed, Afzal
Hi Jon, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:00:20, Hunter, Jon wrote: Nit, holler is slang. Just say WARN. It was a deliberate attempt to add human (or read humorous) touch Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: holler if no configuration

2012-06-12 Thread Jon Hunter
On 06/12/2012 03:44 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: Hi Jon, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:00:20, Hunter, Jon wrote: Nit, holler is slang. Just say WARN. It was a deliberate attempt to add human (or read humorous) touch I like that, but I wonder if it could confuse some :-) Jon -- To

[PATCH v5 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: holler if no configuration

2012-06-11 Thread Afzal Mohammed
Some of the GPMC peripherals depend on bootloader to do the configuration. This facility is deprecated, notify user about the present GPMC settings inform that that relying on bootloader for GPMC setting is deprecated. Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |

Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: holler if no configuration

2012-06-11 Thread Jon Hunter
On 06/11/2012 09:27 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Some of the GPMC peripherals depend on bootloader to do the configuration. This facility is deprecated, notify user about the present GPMC settings inform that that relying on bootloader for GPMC setting is deprecated. Nit, holler is slang. Just