On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 18:48 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:59:03PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:29 +, Mark Brown wrote:
No, that's clearly going to break multi-board kernel images. If this
is something board specific platform/device tree
Regulator users can now set override functions for get_voltage and
set_voltage. This is required by some regulators, which have two
alternate control paths. E.g., OMAP SMPS regulators can be controlled
either through the I2C interface or voltage processor control path,
which uses specialized
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:29:17PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
Why is this only on the OMAP list? Always CC the relevant discussion
list for the subsystem, especially when proposing changes to the
subsystem!
Regulator users can now set override functions for get_voltage and
set_voltage. This is
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:52 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:29:17PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
Why is this only on the OMAP list? Always CC the relevant discussion
list for the subsystem, especially when proposing changes to the
subsystem!
Regulator users can now set
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:20:32PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:52 +, Mark Brown wrote:
My basic reaction to this is eew, ick. Doing this with a runtime call
just feels badly joined up, and there's nothing here which hands off the
configuration between the
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:29 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:20:32PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:52 +, Mark Brown wrote:
My basic reaction to this is eew, ick. Doing this with a runtime call
just feels badly joined up, and there's nothing
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:59:03PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:29 +, Mark Brown wrote:
No, that's clearly going to break multi-board kernel images. If this
is something board specific platform/device tree data sounds like the
way forwards.
Okay, so I will
