Hi Kishon,
Thanks for the explanation.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:01 PM, kishon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thursday 17 January 2013 05:41 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kishon,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is in preparation for the changes
Hi,
On Thursday 17 January 2013 05:41 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Kishon,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
This is in preparation for the changes in PHY library to support adding
and getting multiple PHYs of the same type. In the new design, the
binding informati
Hi Kishon,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This is in preparation for the changes in PHY library to support adding
> and getting multiple PHYs of the same type. In the new design, the
> binding information between the PHY and the USB controller should be
> specif
Hi,
On Thursday 17 January 2013 03:09 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 01/16/2013 05:00 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
This is in preparation for the changes in PHY library to support adding
and getting multiple PHYs of the same type. In the new design, the
binding information between the PHY and
On 01/16/2013 05:00 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This is in preparation for the changes in PHY library to support adding
> and getting multiple PHYs of the same type. In the new design, the
> binding information between the PHY and the USB controller should be
> specified in the platform spe
This is in preparation for the changes in PHY library to support adding
and getting multiple PHYs of the same type. In the new design, the
binding information between the PHY and the USB controller should be
specified in the platform specific initialization code. So it's been
done for OMAP platform