Re: [i2c] N800 problems with MMC, LM8323 on current linux-omap git head

2008-08-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080723 13:13]: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:38:49 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed - compared to my previous version, this one makes the boardfile even smaller: textdata bss dec hex filename 23621552 4

Re: [i2c] N800 problems with MMC, LM8323 on current linux-omap git head

2008-07-23 Thread Riku Voipio
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:20:46AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:43:14 +0100, Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Split them into a common and then machine specfic structures, you are allowed to register more than one board per bus. Good to know :-) Indeed - compared to

Re: [i2c] N800 problems with MMC, LM8323 on current linux-omap git head

2008-07-22 Thread Ben Dooks
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:37:42PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:52:44AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:47:43 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm. I think it would be better to avoid calling the probe in first place. git diff made

Re: [i2c] N800 problems with MMC, LM8323 on current linux-omap git head

2008-07-22 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:43:14 +0100, Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Split them into a common and then machine specfic structures, you are allowed to register more than one board per bus. Good to know :-) Riku, could you update your patch then ? but it anyways doesn't annul the need of