On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Alan,
Thomas:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
Remember that suspend takes place in several phases, the first of which
is to freeze tasks. The phases can be controlled individually by the
process carrying out a suspend, and there's
Alan,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
#2 is a tad harder, as it requires to fix the trusted apps not to fire
timers when there is nothing to do.
No; all you have to do is handle the trusted apps as though they were
untrusted -- just as
Alan,
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The difference between idle-based suspend and opportunistic suspend is
that the former will continue to wake up for timers and will never be
entered if something is using CPU, whereas the latter
