On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:41, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:12, Colin Cross wrote:
>>> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in
>>> OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try
>>> both going lower in addition to the going higher to
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:12, Colin Cross wrote:
>> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in
>> OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try
>> both going lower in addition to the going higher to find
>> a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the k
> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in
> OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try
> both going lower in addition to the going higher to find
> a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the kernel thinks it
> should be allowed. We also sequence
Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in
OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try
both going lower in addition to the going higher to find
a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the kernel thinks it
should be allowed. We also sequence the freque