Re: [pm-wip/voltdm_nm][PATCH 10/10] OMAP2+: PM: init_voltages: handle non compliant bootloaders

2011-06-07 Thread Menon, Nishanth
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:41, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:12, Colin Cross wrote: >>> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in >>> OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try >>> both going lower in addition to the going higher to

Re: [pm-wip/voltdm_nm][PATCH 10/10] OMAP2+: PM: init_voltages: handle non compliant bootloaders

2011-06-07 Thread Menon, Nishanth
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:12, Colin Cross wrote: >> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in >> OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try >> both going lower in addition to the going higher to find >> a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the k

Re: [pm-wip/voltdm_nm][PATCH 10/10] OMAP2+: PM: init_voltages: handle non compliant bootloaders

2011-06-07 Thread Colin Cross
> Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in > OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try > both going lower in addition to the going higher to find > a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the kernel thinks it > should be allowed. We also sequence

[pm-wip/voltdm_nm][PATCH 10/10] OMAP2+: PM: init_voltages: handle non compliant bootloaders

2011-06-07 Thread Nishanth Menon
Bootloaders should in theory setup a frequency which is enabled in OPP table. However, there can be mismatches, and we should try both going lower in addition to the going higher to find a match if bootloader boots up at a OPP than the kernel thinks it should be allowed. We also sequence the freque