2010/7/14 Uwe Kleine-König :
> Note that no kernel is built at all, only the config is regenerated once
> for each line.
You could special case blank lines and comments (other than ones
like "# CONFIG_FOO is not set" which do matter). They account for
~15% of the lines in my .config files. But i
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:34:04PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2010 16:18:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > 2010/7/12 David Brown :
> > >
> > > Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
> > > process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
>> > that nothing e
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:34 AM, David Brown wrote:
> It seems a bit brute force, probably not something I can make part of
> our regular build process, but I can definitely run it before sending
> patches out.
>
> I wonder if there's a more efficient way of doing it that doesn't
> involve invokin
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:07:05AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On Mon, J
2010/7/13 Uwe Kleine-König :
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> >> I think Uwe could provide his script and add it to the kernel tree.
>>
On Monday 12 July 2010 18:18:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 2010/7/12 David Brown :
> > Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
> > process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
> > nice to be able to make small defconfigs for those targets as well.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:07:05AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > > wrote:
> > > >
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >> I think Uwe could pr
Hi
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> I think Uwe could provide his script and add it to the kernel tree.
> >> Then all architectures could benefi
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, David Brown wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2010 16:18:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > 2010/7/12 David Brown :
> > >
> > > Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
> > > process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
> > > nice to be
On Monday 12 July 2010 16:18:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 2010/7/12 David Brown :
> >
> > Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
> > process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
> > nice to be able to make small defconfigs for those targets as well
2010/7/12 David Brown :
>
> Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
> process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
> nice to be able to make small defconfigs for those targets as well.
Uwe posted it earlier in this thread as an attachement, and I
On Monday 12 July 2010 11:50:29 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> If it helps the powerpc people I can reduce their defconfigs, too.
Do you have scripts or tools that you did this with, or is a manual
process. We're about to add several new (ARM) targets, and it'd be
nice to be able to make small defcon
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> For the record, I do support Uwe's work too. I do wish it could go in
> now so that from that point going forward we could only focus on
> improving the thing instead of having to care about implications during
> the merge window.
Ok, I m
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2010 20:50:29 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >
> > [1] The following changes since commit
> > 67a3e12b05e055c0415c556a315a3d3eb637e29e:
> >
> > Linux 2.6.35-rc1 (2010-05-30 13:21:02 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at
On Monday 12 July 2010 20:50:29 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> [1] The following changes since commit
> 67a3e12b05e055c0415c556a315a3d3eb637e29e:
>
> Linux 2.6.35-rc1 (2010-05-30 13:21:02 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux-2.6.git
> arm
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
> > > that nothing except yo
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>
> >> Put another way: I realize that fairly late in the -rc series is
> >> actually a really good time to do this, rather than during the merge
> >> window itself when things are in flux. H
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> >
> > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
> > that nothing except your solution was going to be acceptable.
>
> That's not true. What
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>
> >> Put another way: I realize that fairly late in the -rc series is
> >> actually a really good time to do this, rather than during the merge
> >> window it
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> I think Uwe could provide his script and add it to the kernel tree.
>> Then all architectures could benefit from it. Having the defconfig
>> files contain only those options which a
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>
>> Put another way: I realize that fairly late in the -rc series is
>> actually a really good time to do this, rather than during the merge
>> window itself when things are in flux. However, while it would be a
>> good time to pull this
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'd happily pull it. Just this single line in your email is a very
> very powerful thing:
>
> > 177 files changed, 652 insertions(+), 194157 deletions(-)
>
> However, before I would pull, I'd definitely like to make sure we at
> least have some way f
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I hope you at least do agree that the current situation is a steaming
> > pile of sh*t. And yes, I _will_ remove the crap, both from POWER and
> > ARM, unless I see some serious tries
2010/7/12 Uwe Kleine-König :
>
> I'm willing to try my solution, some others on the linux-arm-kernel
> lists considered it worth trying, too. Feel free to pull my tree[1].
> Russell refused to take defconfig changes for a while now, so I don't
> expect merge problems if you do.
Well, I can hardly
Hello Linus,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> >
> > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
> > that nothing except your solution was going to be acceptable.
>
> That's
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
>
> When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced
> that nothing except your solution was going to be acceptable.
That's not true. What's true is that you didn't seem to _understand_
my solution, so I tried to pus
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:51:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So if the ARM people decide that your script is a good way to clean up
> the mess, I might be happy with that. But that would require that they
> NEVER EVER try to push me a update that contains an un-cleaned-up
> defconfig file.
Do
2010/7/12 Uwe Kleine-König :
>
> As you havn't replied up to now I wonder if that just means that you
> still plan to remove all defconfig files or if you are just busy doing
> other things.
The reason I haven't replied is that
(a) I don't think this really "solves" the issue, in that the
result
Hi Linus,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:40:43PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I think my mail hit your inbox during your vacation. As this is quite
> important for the ARM people and there isn't much time left, can you
> please comment?
As you havn't replied up to now I wonder if that just means
Hi Linus,
I think my mail hit your inbox during your vacation. As this is quite
important for the ARM people and there isn't much time left, can you
please comment?
Thanks in advance
Uwe
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [Added linux-arm-kernel ML t
32 matches
Mail list logo
