Hi, Nishanth Menon
One more question.
Do we need to implement the same thing in bootloader?
I.e. Do we need to disable L2 prior invalidating L2 for OMAP3630 1st boot up?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
TAO HU had written, on 11/30/2010 12:03 AM, the
TAO HU had written, on 12/01/2010 02:56 AM, the following:
Do we need to implement the same thing in bootloader?
I.e. Do we need to disable L2 prior invalidating L2 for OMAP3630 1st boot up?
Though out of context for this email list (linux kernel :)), I believe
it wont hurt to do this as a
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:09 PM
To: TAO HU
Cc: TAO HU; linux-omap; Jean; Tony; Kevin; Vishwa
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] OMAP3630: PM: Disable
Varadarajan, Charulatha had written, on 11/30/2010 12:12 AM, the following:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index bd426cc..e0ade5f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -988,6 +988,9 @@ static void
TAO HU had written, on 11/30/2010 12:03 AM, the following:
What would happen without this patch? L2 data corruption after back
from OFF mode?
I believe yes.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to
Nishant,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:49, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver peter.de-schrij...@nokia.com
This disables L2 cache before invalidating it and reenables it afterwards.
This is be done according to ARM documentation. Currently this is identified
as
Hi, Nishanth Menon
What would happen without this patch? L2 data corruption after back
from OFF mode?
--
Best Regards
Hu Tao
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver peter.de-schrij...@nokia.com
This disables L2 cache before
