Hi Tony, Jon,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:05:56, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/20/2012 10:12 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120620 07:57]:
Therefore, I am wondering if Afzal's driver needs to register the gpmc
devices outside of the gpmc_probe() and add the devices as
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120616 02:19]:
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 18:15:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120615 03:26]:
Here clock is required even before driver is probed, i.e for platform to
calculate timings, that has to be passed through
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 18:58:49, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120616 02:19]:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 18:15:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
By gpmc registration, if you meant registering platform device for
gpmc peripherals, for a board that uses the new gpmc
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120620 07:57]:
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 18:58:49, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120616 02:19]:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 18:15:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
By gpmc registration, if you meant registering platform device for
On 06/20/2012 10:12 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120620 07:57]:
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 18:58:49, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120616 02:19]:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 18:15:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
By gpmc registration, if you
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 18:15:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120615 03:26]:
Here clock is required even before driver is probed, i.e for platform to
calculate timings, that has to be passed through platform data.
Eventually we should be able to move the
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 00:28:44, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/14/2012 08:32 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 18:52:55, Hunter, Jon wrote:
Why? You currently have a global variable storing the clock handle. It
can be quite common for drivers to know the clock
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/14/2012 01:17 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
gpmc_cs_set_timings() does currently convert time to clock cycles required,
and this gpmc driver have the capability to do it.
What I was saying is a different issue, input to
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120615 03:26]:
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 00:28:44, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/14/2012 08:32 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 18:52:55, Hunter, Jon wrote:
Why? You currently have a global variable storing the clock handle. It
Hi Paul,
On 06/14/2012 07:20 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
What does make this a bit more difficult is the function
gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks(). It appears to convert nanoseconds to ticks and
back to nanoseconds. I am guessing to account for some rounding
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
I do not think it is practically possible. Please see timing calculations
in arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-*, the way it is done for different
peripherals are different, and we cannot expect gpmc driver to do those as
that would
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:47:03, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
gpmc_cs_set_timings() does currently convert time to clock cycles required,
and this gpmc driver have the capability to do it.
What I was saying is a different issue, input to gpmc_cs_set_timings, which
is time sometimes in
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there
is no reason why the driver cannot do this.
I believe passing clk details through platform data is an abuse of
clock framework.
Regards
Afzal
--
To
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:38:09, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/13/2012 08:05 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Do you mean that gpmc driver should have the capability to calculate
peripheral
timings at runtime based on frequency ?, I am not sure how this can be
handled
by gpmc driver
On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there
is no reason why the driver cannot do this.
I believe passing clk details through platform data is an
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 18:52:55, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there
is no reason why the driver cannot do this.
I
On 06/14/2012 08:32 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 18:52:55, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there
is no
Hi Afzal,
On 06/14/2012 01:17 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
I do not think it is practically possible. Please see timing calculations
in arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-*, the way it is done for different
peripherals are different, and
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Jon Hunter wrote:
What does make this a bit more difficult is the function
gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks(). It appears to convert nanoseconds to ticks and
back to nanoseconds. I am guessing to account for some rounding error. I
am curious what impact this function is having on
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120612 22:24]:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/12/2012 01:53 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:29, Hunter, Jon wrote:
My preference would be to store gpmc_l3_clk in the pdata and pass to
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:32:09, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120612 22:24]:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
Right but potentially, this could be done by the driver.
I do not think it is practically possible. Please
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120613 06:10]:
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:32:09, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120612 22:24]:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
Right but potentially, this could be done by the driver.
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 19:09:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120613 06:10]:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:32:09, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Do you mean that gpmc driver should have the capability to calculate
peripheral
timings at runtime based on frequency ?,
Hi Afzal,
On 06/13/2012 12:20 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/12/2012 01:53 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:29, Hunter, Jon wrote:
My preference would be to store gpmc_l3_clk in the pdata and pass to
Hi Afzal,
On 06/13/2012 08:05 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:32:09, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120612 22:24]:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
Right but potentially, this could be done by the driver.
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:29, Hunter, Jon wrote:
+ pdev = omap_device_build(name, -1, oh, pdata,
+ sizeof(*pdata), NULL, 0, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
+ WARN(1, Can't build omap_device for %s:%s.\n,
+
On 06/12/2012 01:53 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:29, Hunter, Jon wrote:
+ pdev = omap_device_build(name, -1, oh, pdata,
+ sizeof(*pdata), NULL, 0, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
+ WARN(1, Can't build
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:10:01, Hunter, Jon wrote:
On 06/12/2012 01:53 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:29, Hunter, Jon wrote:
My preference would be to store gpmc_l3_clk in the pdata and pass to
probe via the pdata. The aim would be to remove the global
Hi Afzal,
On 06/11/2012 09:26 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Create API for platforms to adapt gpmc to HWMOD
Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 31 +++
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h |2 ++
2 files
29 matches
Mail list logo
