Hi All,
So, based on feedbacks from everyone, I could come to following
conclusions. Please confirm, if those are acceptable ?
From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutl...@arm.com]
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Rob Herring
Hi,
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
index df338cb..958e5d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
@@ -21,11 +21,8
Anyway, at this point I think your patch series should be nearly
complete. I made a few comments on your patches, and I'd imagine you
only should need one more revision (v7) before I can accept it to the
l2-mtd.git tree.
Yes surely I will send next version (v7), but it might take few
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly) been
Hi Mark,
Pekon, could you please re-send this version of the patches?
As already there are feedbacks on the patches, so re-sending the
Patch series might clutter someone else's mailbox.
Will it be possible for you to fetch the patches from MTD archives?
else I would send you the patches
From: Rob Herring [mailto:robherri...@gmail.com]
From: Pekon Gupta [mailto:pe...@ti.com]
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
index df338cb..958e5d5 100644
---
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Rob Herring [mailto:robherri...@gmail.com]
From: Pekon Gupta [mailto:pe...@ti.com]
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
[I see Mark made some of the same comments while I was typing this
email]
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 06:08:42AM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Rob Herring [mailto:robherri...@gmail.com]
From: Pekon Gupta [mailto:pe...@ti.com]
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
+ akpm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0500, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
This patch
- updates DT binding for selection of ecc-scheme
- updates DT binding for detection of ELM h/w engine
- removes following obselete ECC schemes
OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_DEFAULT (S/W based 1-bit Hamming
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ akpm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0500, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
This patch
- updates DT binding for selection of ecc-scheme
- updates DT binding for detection of ELM h/w engine
- removes following obselete
Hi Pekon,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ akpm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0500, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
This patch
- updates DT binding for selection of ecc-scheme
- updates DT binding for detection of ELM h/w engine
- removes following
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:20:16PM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
OMAP NAND driver support multiple ECC scheme, which can used in following
different flavours, depending on in-build Hardware engines supported by SoC.
+---+---+---+
| ECC
Hi Brian,
Hi Pekon,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ akpm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0500, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
[snip]
Dear Olof and other DT Maintainers,
This patch series has missed multiple merge windows, and
much of the other
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ akpm
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0500, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
[snip]
Dear Olof and other DT Maintainers,
This patch series has missed
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly) been
responding to other requests for DT review that make it to his list. I
see that he hasn't followed up on your changes (this v6), so pinging him
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly) been
responding to other requests for DT review that make it to his list. I
see
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Pekon Gupta pe...@ti.com wrote:
OMAP NAND driver support multiple ECC scheme, which can used in following
different flavours, depending on in-build Hardware engines supported by SoC.
+---+---+---+
|
This patch
- updates DT binding for selection of ecc-scheme
- updates DT binding for detection of ELM h/w engine
- removes following obselete ECC schemes
OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_DEFAULT (S/W based 1-bit Hamming
ECC)
OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW_ROMCODE (H/W based 1-bit
Hamming ECC
20 matches
Mail list logo
