IGEP v2 boards has console as ttyO2,115200n8.
It's better so simply set this as the default kernel argument
directly in the device tree board file.
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free
Hello Tony,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [121219 11:28]:
Hi all,
These patches enable multiplatform support for omap2plus.
To build and boot it against the current mainline kernel
you need the following:
[PATCH
successfully booted my IGEPv2 board using:
* arm-soc/for-next
* igep DT patches
* this multiplatform series
* the two patches mentioned above
With this series CONFIG_MACH_IGEP0020 is not needed,
just CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_GENERIC is selected.
So I guess this means, for igep v2,
Tested-by: Ezequiel
) ?
+ GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,
+ template-name);
if (ret 0)
return ret;
--
1.7.7.6
Without this patch my IGEP v2 LEDs were dead,
and this patch brings them back.
Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free
Hi Enric and Javier,
The u-boot 'bootargs' env overwrites the one from chosen ?
I just tested and U-Boot 'bootargs' has precedence over DT bootargs
but I didn't find a way to append boot parameters from U-Boot. You can
either overwrite it completely or not.
Yes. That seems to be the
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
martinez.jav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Enric and Javier,
The u-boot 'bootargs' env overwrites the one from chosen ?
I just tested and U-Boot 'bootargs' has
Hi Daniel,
Nice job!
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC.
The actual peripherals are instantiated from child nodes within the GPMC
node, and the only type of device that is currently supported is NAND.
Code
Hi everyone,
Just in case anyone wants to access his OneNAND device,
here's a little patchset. Feedback is more than welcome.
It's based on arm-soc/for-next with Daniel Mack's GPMC patches.
Ezequiel Garcia (3):
mtd: omap-onenand: pass device_node in platform data
arm: omap2: gpmc-onenand
-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c |4 +++-
include/linux/platform_data/mtd-onenand-omap2.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c
gpmc_onenand_init() will be called from another driver's probe() function,
so drop the __init annotation, in order to prevent section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions
This patch adds device tree bindings for OMAP OneNAND devices.
Tested on an OMAP3 3430 IGEPv2 board.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-onenand.txt | 44
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
This patch adds device tree bindings for OMAP OneNAND devices.
Tested on an OMAP3 3430 IGEPv2 board.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mtd
These regulators are common to igep0020 and igep0030 boards
and are needed by smsc911x controller.
Cc: Benoît Cousson b-cous...@ti.com
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com [130114 15:30]:
On Jan 15, 2013 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com [121223 13:49]:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Mack zon
Artem,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Pass an optional device_node pointer in the platform data,
which in turn will be put into a mtd_part_parser_data.
This way, code that sets up the platform devices can pass
along the node from DT
Tony,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com [130114 15:30]:
On Jan 15, 2013 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com [121223 13:49]:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Mack
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com [130118 11:43]:
Tony,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com [130114 15:30]:
On Jan 15, 2013 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren
Bityutskiy artem.bityuts...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c |4 +++-
include/linux/platform_data/mtd-onenand-omap2.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
gpmc_onenand_init() will be called from another driver's probe() function,
so drop the __init annotation, in order to prevent section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions
This patch adds device tree bindings for OMAP OneNAND devices.
Tested on an OMAP3 3430 IGEPv2 board.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
Changes from v1:
* Fix typo in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-onenand.txt
.../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
index 01ce462..f7de9eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tony, Mark, Ezequiel,
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com [130121 09:00]:
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
wrote:
[...]
diff
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com [130122 10:17]:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently far away from my computer and can't prepare a patch for
this, sorry. But I
for_each_node_by_name() automatically calls of_node_put() on each
node passed; so don't do it explicitly unless there's an error.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |5 +++--
1 files
Bityutskiy artem.bityuts...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c |4 +++-
include/linux/platform_data/mtd-onenand-omap2.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
gpmc_onenand_init() will be called from another driver's probe() function,
so drop the __init annotation, in order to prevent section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions
This patch adds device tree bindings for OMAP OneNAND devices.
Tested on an OMAP3 3430 IGEPv2 board.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
Changes from v2:
* Remove unneeded of_node_put() as reported by Mark Rutland
Changes from v1:
* Fix typo in Documentation
Hi Mark,
First of all: thanks for reviewing.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple more comments after looking though this a bit more thoroughly.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:23:11PM +, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
This patch adds device
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote:
Okay ... I have made some progress, but it's not ideal.
Currently I've hacked the GPMC DT driver (gpmc_probe_dt(), etc) so it now
handles setting up the
chip selects and timings for NOR devices, e.g.
of the probe, but
before we call the gpmc child probe functions (for device-tree) which
request a chip-select.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
Without this patch, GPMC is currently broken on my igep board setup,
if initialized through a device tree.
Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia
the gpmc-nand patch is tested by compilation only.
Altough these patchset is almost trivial,
any feedback or testing is more than welcome.
Ezequiel Garcia (7):
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Mark local scoped functions static
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Remove unused gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks() function
ARM: omap2: gpmc
This patch marks a bunch of functions that are local
to gpmc.c file only as static.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 14 +++---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h |7 ---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
index ffe3e1e..bd3bc93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
Fix gpmc_cs_reserved() so it returns 0 if the chip select
is available (not reserved) or an error otherwise.
This allows to use the return value directly and return a proper error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 12
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
index 0ee5317..4771945 100644
--- a/arch
Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 06:55:32PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:38:16PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free
Hi Felipe,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 06:53:35PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:38:12PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Fix gpmc_cs_reserved() so it returns 0 if the chip select
is available (not reserved) or an error otherwise.
This allows to use the return value
Hi Jon
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
This is being call from the mach-omap2/board-generic.c file on boot.
Where are you suggesting this is called from?
I was suggesting this could be called in gpmc_probe_dt() in gpmc.c.
Instead of using
.
Ezequiel Garcia (8):
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Mark local scoped functions static
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Remove unused gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks() function
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Fix gpmc_cs_reserved() return value
ARM: omap2: gpmc-nand: Print something useful on CS request failure
ARM: omap2: gpmc-onenand
This patch marks a bunch of functions that are local
to gpmc.c file only as static.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 14 +++---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h |7 ---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
index ffe3e1e..bd3bc93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions
is reserved,
* false if it's available
Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
Changelog from v1:
* As suggested by Felipe Balbi, fix return code to a boolean
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
index 0ee5317..4771945 100644
--- a/arch
Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc
This check is done before the call to gpmc_cs_reserved() and
gpmc_cs_set_reserved() and it's redundant to do it again in each
function. This simplifies the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 10 +-
1 files
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:12:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [130212 08:36]:
On 02/12/2013 09:18 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
This patchset is v2 of the small cleanup consisting in:
* mark some functions as 'static' when appropriate
* remove
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:43:25AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com [130212 10:29]:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:12:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com [130212 08:36]:
On 02/12/2013 09:18 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
is tested by compilation only.
Altough this patchset is almost trivial,
any feedback or testing is more than welcome.
Thanks to Jon Hunter for his kind review!
Ezequiel Garcia (8):
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Mark local scoped functions static
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Remove unused gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks() function
This patch marks a bunch of functions that are local
to gpmc.c file only as static.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 14 +++---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h |7 ---
2 files
This function is not used anywhere, so it's safe to remove it.
This means less code to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7
is reserved,
* false if it's available
Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
Changelog from v1:
* As suggested by Felipe Balbi, fix return code to a boolean
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c |3 ++-
1 files
If CS request fails the current error message is rather unhelpful.
Fix it by printing the failing chip select and the error code.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |3 ++-
1 files
Do this becasue dev_err() is preferred over pr_err() and because
it will match gpmc-nand, thus the code shows looks more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |7
Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions
This check is done before the call to gpmc_cs_reserved() and
gpmc_cs_set_reserved() and it's redundant to do it again in each
function. This simplifies the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach
a bit strange to put GPMC under drivers/bus.
Ezequiel Garcia (1):
ARM: omap2: gpmc: Move binding documentation to memory-controller
.../ti-gpmc.txt = memory-controllers/ti/gpmc.txt} |0
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{bus/ti
-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
.../ti-gpmc.txt = memory-controllers/ti/gpmc.txt} |0
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{bus/ti-gpmc.txt =
memory-controllers/ti/gpmc.txt} (100%)
diff --git a/Documentation
Hi Jon,
I'm working on a similar memory controller for plat-orion.
I have a few questions about your approach.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:07:06PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 02/07/2013 03:51 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
Okay ... I have made some progress, but it's not ideal.
Currently I've
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:13:27AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 02/13/2013 05:13 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
GPMC stands for General Purpose Memory Controller, and it's primarily
used to handle memories such as NOR, NAND, SRAM.
Note that this controller is also used to handle network
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:09:26AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:33:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 08 February 2013 12:06:44 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
I don't know what to do here, there is no point to build any of the files
in mach-mvebu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:08:03AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:03:08AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:09:26AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:33:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 08
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:27:07AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:08:03AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
It's all publically available via my website.
I'm kind of new around here, and I
Arnd,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:21:16PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Now, using the random config there's a new error, unrelated to the
previous one:
ERROR: twl6030_interrupt_unmask [drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.ko]
undefined
Hello,
I'd like to know which are the current constraints
preventing us from moving OMAP's GPMC memory controller driver
from mach-omap2/ to drivers/memory-controller.
I imagine one of the biggest issues is GPMC's dependency on
hwmod code. Can anyone shed some light on how to handle this?
Is
Hi Anil,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:49:21PM +0530, Anil Kumar wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Currently gpmc_cs_reserved() return value is somewhat inconsistent,
returning a negative value on an error condition
Hi Anil,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:08:27PM +0530, Anil Kumar wrote:
Add gpmc DT node.
Signed-off-by: Anil Kumar anilk...@gmail.com
---
:100644 100644 1acc261... 9f36531... March/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:08:08PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 02/15/2013 01:53 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
I imagine one of the biggest issues is GPMC's dependency on
hwmod code. Can anyone shed some light on how to handle
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
[...]
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(np, gpmc,bus-turnaround, val))
+ gpmc_t-bus_turnaround = val;
+
AFAIK, you don't need to test if the property is defined.
You can just read it straightforward,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
[...]
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(np, gpmc,bus-turnaround, val))
+ gpmc_t-bus_turnaround = val;
+
AFAIK, you don't
Hi Jon,
Yet more questions :-) See below...
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
You don't need this extra entry if you add simple-bus to
the gpmc node compatible string.
+ gpmc: gpmc@6800a000 {
+ compatible =
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
[...]
+static int gpmc_probe_nor_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct device_node *child)
+{
+ struct gpmc_settings gpmc_s;
+ struct gpmc_timings gpmc_t;
+
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
Yet more questions :-) See below...
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
You don't need this extra entry if you add simple-bus to
the gpmc node compatible string
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
+
+Example:
+
+gpmc: gpmc@6e00 {
+ compatible = ti,omap3430-gpmc, simple-bus;
I'm concern about using simple-bus, and I'm not entirely sure this will work.
AFAIK, you can't correlate a parent-child
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
This really highlights a weakness in the GPMC driver, particularly
for NOR, where the child device can only be probed once the parent
is probed. I don't see this as being DT specific issue, because
even on older OMAP
Jon,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
By the way, with this version you should remove simple-bus from your
gpmc node compatible strings. I now call of_platform_device_create() to
create the child device during the GPMC probe. I think that this is a
safer
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
On 03/06/2013 05:58 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
I'll submit this driver by the end of this week, in case you want
to take a look at it.
Ok, but this is not for omap right?
No, this is a new driver for a memory controller
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
On 03/06/2013 05:58 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
I'll submit this driver by the end of this week, in case you want
to take a look at it.
Ok
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
jav...@dowhile0.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Yes you are correct. In general, I have been trying to stay some-what
consistent with what hwmod was doing as this was being auto-generated
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Yes, I full agree with that as well. The size should be purely HW
related. So we should not take any assumption about the page size /
alignment.
Ok, what is best to use? The size from hwmod structures or the size from
the
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21:00AM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
The GPMC has wait-pin signals that can be assigned to a chip-select
to monitor the ready signal of an external device. Add a variable to
indicate the total number of wait-pins for a given device. This will
allow us to detect
Hi Jon,
I have some tiny nitpicks...
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21:08AM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
Adds a function to read the various GPMC chip-select settings from
device-tree and store them in the gpmc_settings structure.
Update the GPMC device-tree binding documentation to describe these
mode, burst settings, wait monitoring etc.
Therefore, to simplify the GPMC code and add device-tree support for
NOR, it was first necessary to consolidate how these settings are
programmed.
Series based upon Mark Jackson's patch [1] and Ezequiel Garcia GPMC
clean-up series [2]. Entire series
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
bige...@linutronix.de wrote:
This enables the two musb instances on am335x to work.
I like a lot the idea of splitting the DT representation of the two
USB instances. The DT binding
looks much better this way.
After some
Hi guys,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:27:20PM +0530, Balaji T K wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2013 06:04 PM, a-bin...@ti.com wrote:
From: Amarinder Bindra a-bin...@ti.com
OMAP's hs_mmc driver is also used for OMAP5 MMC controller operation.
Considering that the device tree entries are already
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:58:28PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10:46-20130708, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 05:13:10PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Hi guys,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:27:20PM +0530, Balaji T K wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2013 06:04 PM, a-bin
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:44:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
We need two nodes each one with a glue layer and a musb child node. The
instances crap in kernel has to vanish. Also that means your phy nodes
are wrong. This is not musb with two ports but two musb instances each
for these,
allow the driver to be built using the config ARCH_OMAP2PLUS rather
than individually adding a config for each SoC to enable the
support.
Use COMPILE_TEST to enable the build for other platforms.
Signed-off-by: Amarinder Bindra a-bin...@ti.com
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 07:12:29PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
After some minor DT tweaking on the current patchset,
I've managed to detect an USB mass storage device in the
second instance (host / usb1) using a Beaglebone black board.
Beaglebone black, that one
Fix the option description to match the other TI SoCs.
This is just a cosmetic change.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:04:33PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
This patch series adds phy support for AM335X platform.
This patch series is based on Generic PHY framework [1].
This series has
- adds dual musb instances support for am335x platform
- adds phy-am-usb
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Fix the option description to match the other TI SoCs.
This is just a cosmetic change.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia
Brian,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:13:32PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
On 10/22/2013 10:07 PM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpe...@gmail.com]
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 02:14:08PM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
[...]
Thus this patch run nand_scan_ident() with
Hi Gupta,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:15:20PM +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
Hi,
From: Ezequiel Garcia [mailto:ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com]
[...]
FWIW, I have a Beaglebone with a 16-bit bus NAND attached to it.
Coincidentally, yesterday I was doing some tests as I'm ramping up
Gupta,
I already have a question :-)
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 02:14:14PM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
With OMAP NAND driver updates, selection of ecc-scheme:
*DT enabled kernel*
depends on ti,nand-ecc-opt and ti,elm-id DT bindings.
*Non DT enabled kernel*
depends on elm_dev and
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
