Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR

2011-06-30 Thread Peter De Schrijver
+/* + * This function implements the erratum ID i581 WA: + * SDRC state restore before accessing the SDRAM + * + * Only used at return from non-OFF mode. For OFF + * mode the ROM code configures the SDRC and + * the DPLL before calling the restore code directly + * from DDR. + */ + +/*

Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] OMAP4: PM data big spring cleanup and fixes

2011-07-08 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:11:43AM +0200, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Martin Fouts wrote: From: Tony Lindgren [t...@atomide.com] The second problem we have here is why does adding 4460 support depend on a cosmetic clean-up patch. That dependency should not exist at all

Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency

2013-02-21 Thread Peter De Schrijver
Also, IMHO reset should always be done during probe() so driver can be dead sure that we're starting from a known state. This is even more Depends on the IP block. Eg: you might want to keep the screen showing the contents drawn by the bootloader while booting the kernel and smoothly change

Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround

2013-03-01 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66

Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: dt: add support for default rate/parent

2014-03-21 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-03-05 05:10:17) Ping. Mike, any feedback on this? Hi Tero, Have you seen Sylwester's approach[1]? I prefer it since it is more device-oriented and less centralized. The clock consumer

Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: dt: add support for default rate/parent

2014-03-25 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:38:47AM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2014-03-21 01:12:17) On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-03-05 05:10:17) Ping. Mike, any feedback on this? Hi Tero

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Per-user clock constraints

2014-10-31 Thread Peter De Schrijver
on top of 3.18-rc1. http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=per-user-clk-constraints-v5 Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver pdeschrij...@nvidia.com Mike, Do you think this will be merged for 3.19? Thanks, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap

Re: [PATCH v4 02/21] irqchip: tegra: add DT-based support for legacy interrupt controller

2015-01-19 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:43:56AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote: Tegra's LIC (Legacy Interrupt Controller) has been so far only supported as a weird extension of the GIC, which is not exactly pretty. The stacked IRQ domain framework fits this pretty well, and allows the LIC code to be turned