Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 19:45:33, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org writes:
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Sourav,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
[...]
Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to
Hi Kevin,
On Thursday 11 April 2013 07:45 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilmankhil...@linaro.org writes:
Bedia, Vaibhavvaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Sourav,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
[...]
Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
Hi Vaibhav,
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
[...]
So, my proposal is that Sourav remove that flag from the AM33xx hwmod
when he removes this feature.
Apologies for the delayed response. I was out of office for a couple of
days.
I don't recall the exact kernel version in which
Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org writes:
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Sourav,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
[...]
Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
But how exactly this gets used, I mean I don't see any drivers/
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:37 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
Hi Sourav, Kevin,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:37:28, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:37 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Vaibhav,
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 11:49 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Sourav, Kevin,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:37:28, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:37 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10
Hi Sourav,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
[...]
Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
But how exactly this gets used, I mean I don't see any drivers/ in mainline
making use of this compatible string ti,am3352-ocmcram. ?
OCMC clock is
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Sourav,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
[...]
Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
But how exactly this gets used, I mean I don't see any drivers/ in mainline
making use of this
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
no_console_suspend in the bootargs. With no_console_suspend used, we
should prevent the runtime suspend of the uart
Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav Poddarsourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
no_console_suspend in the bootargs. With no_console_suspend used, we
Hi Russell,
On Monday 08 April 2013 10:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:45:33PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
no_console_suspend in the bootargs. With no_console_suspend used, we
should prevent
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:45:33PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
no_console_suspend in the bootargs. With no_console_suspend used, we
should prevent the runtime suspend of the uart port which is getting used
as an console.
Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
no_console_suspend in the bootargs. With no_console_suspend used, we
should prevent the runtime suspend of the uart port which is getting used
as an console.
Cc: Santosh
14 matches
Mail list logo
