Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
On 16/08/2013 07:15, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Benoit, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:18 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. [1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? I think it shouldn't cause any issues. However Mark has already merged the driver changes. Cool. I've just applied your patch in for_3.12/dts Thanks, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
On Friday 16 August 2013 02:24 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: On 16/08/2013 07:15, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Benoit, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:18 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. [1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? I think it shouldn't cause any issues. However Mark has already merged the driver changes. Cool. I've just applied your patch in for_3.12/dts Thanks :-) Regards Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
Hi Benoit, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:18 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. [1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? I think it shouldn't cause any issues. However Mark has already merged the driver changes. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Otherwise, it should be seen as one output with two potential consumers. Regards, Benoit Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts index 65d7b60..05b9b12 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts @@ -334,9 +334,18 @@ ti,smps-range = 0x80; }; - smps10_reg: smps10 { + smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 { /* VBUS_5V_OTG */ - regulator-name = smps10; + regulator-name = smps10_out2; + regulator-min-microvolt = 500; + regulator-max-microvolt = 500; + regulator-always-on; + regulator-boot-on; + }; + + smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 { + /* VBUS_5V_OTG */ + regulator-name = smps10_out1; regulator-min-microvolt = 500; regulator-max-microvolt = 500; regulator-always-on; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
Hi, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. [1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] arm: omap5: dts: split SMPS10 dt node
On 13/08/2013 16:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 13 August 2013 06:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Kishon, On 12/08/2013 11:37, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2. Hence SMPS10 is modeled as two regulators. The dt node is split to reflect it. Mmm, I'm curious. How is it supposed to work? Do you have dedicated control on each output? Yes. It can be controlled by setting different values to the same bit fields. You can refer [1] where we actually implement SMPS10 as two different regulators. [1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1542521 Great, thanks. Can we merge that one safely if the driver changed are not done yet? Regards, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html